| Connect to share and comment |
|
|
Connect to share and comment |
| International News | ||
| 12:02 | GlobalPost | As you know, the US, followed by Japan, recently issued a travel alert for the whole of the European continent, warning of a terrorist threat. |
| 12:03 | GlobalPost | Teri, what is the reaction in Brussels? Has there already been a drop in tourism? |
| 12:03 | teri-schultz | Hello from Brussels! |
| 12:04 | teri-schultz | The initial reaction honestly seemed a bit confused... |
| 12:04 | teri-schultz | we learned later that there WERE some phone calls between U.S. officials and European Union officials but since the travel alert |
| 12:05 | teri-schultz | came to the general public here via media and not their own governments (and on a Sunday), people seemed to be a bit perplexed. |
| 12:05 | GlobalPost | Now is there a reason why the warning came from the US and not from the EU as well? |
| 12:05 | teri-schultz | There wasn't much information to be had and since these travel alerts are an American product, Europeans weren't sure what to make of it. |
| 12:06 | teri-schultz | The very publication of such a thing with no back-up information can be frightening! |
| 12:06 | teri-schultz |
So Monday morning comes and people start asking questions...for which European leaders had few answers. :/ |
| 12:07 | teri-schultz | I spoke with a woman at the European Travel Commission, representing 38 countries, and she was rather annoyed that the back-up |
| 12:07 | teri-schultz | information seemed to point to just Britain, France and Germany, yet the alert was for all of Europe. |
| 12:08 | GP-ChatHost | A brief note to the audience... |
| 12:08 | teri-schultz | So the tourism industry indeed fears a drop in traffic, but thus far this week there hasn't seemed to be any such precipitous drop. |
| 12:08 | teri-schultz | As for why it came from the U.S. and not the EU -- there is no such system in the EU. No "travel alerts", "travel warnings' -- nothing! |
| 12:09 | teri-schultz | The U.S. State Department is legally required to make public any threat information it has -- this is as a result of the Lockerbie |
| 12:09 | teri-schultz | bombing when diplomats received warnings and civilians did not -- but there's nothing like that here in Europe. |
| 12:10 | teri-schultz | As a matter of fact, today justice ministers meeting in Luxembourg are starting to talk about having a Europe-wide alert or at the |
| 12:10 | teri-schultz | very least a way of letting all 27 members know what the others are doing as far as national alerts. |
| 12:10 | GP-ChatHost | Okay, now, a brief note to the audience... |
| 12:10 | GP-ChatHost | If you have a question for Teri, please message the GP-ChatHost by pasting the following into the message box: "/msg GP-ChatHost FOLLOWED BY YOUR MESSAGE." |
| 12:10 | GP-ChatHost | without the quotes, of course |
| 12:11 | GP-ChatHost | Okay, that's it for my message... |
| 12:11 | GP-ChatHost | Go ahead, GP |
| 12:12 | GlobalPost | Okay. This gets into the usual question about the EU: is there a benefit to centralization or do member states have the impetus on security. Have any changes their security procedures since the alert? |
| 12:13 | teri-schultz | Member states have chosen specifically -- including as recently as when they negotiated the new Lisbon Treaty over last couple years -- to keep the responsibility for |
| 12:14 | teri-schultz | counter-terrorism and security at the national level. Even EU members don't want to have to share their most sensitive law-enforcement data which yes, can be |
| 12:15 | teri-schultz | a hindrance but is nonetheless their right. Now there is finally more talk about coordination -- not handing over responsibility for fighting terrorism -- at the EU level. |
| 12:15 | teri-schultz | There exists a "coordinator" so it's a matter of deciding what they want him to do. There have been some security upgrades on the ground in Paris and London, |
| 12:16 | teri-schultz | I believe, but here in Brussels, for example, nothing was changed for a major head-of-state Asian summit this week and Germany has flatly said -- |
| 12:16 | teri-schultz | despite being one of the three rumored to be the target countries -- that it sees no reason to raise alarm. |
| 12:16 | GP-ChatHost | Okay, we have a question from the audience, one MilesAhead (perhaps a jazz guy?) |
| 12:16 | GP-ChatHost | milesahead: How does the "terror card" play in European politics? is it a sensitive, hot-button issue like it is in the U.S.? |
| 12:17 | teri-schultz | Interesting question -- which to some extent depends here, as it does in the U.S., on election cycles! |
| 12:18 | teri-schultz | The issue of terrorism from outside is nowhere near as neuralgic an issue here as it is in the States. With 27 countries, you have a huge range |
| 12:18 | teri-schultz | of perceptions in what a "threat" is. In Spain, most people may well consider Basque separatists as the biggest "terrorists"... |
| 12:19 | teri-schultz | so there has never been a unified concept of terrorism, as we have had in the U.S. |
| 12:20 | teri-schultz | But the last several years have caused a marked shift in threat perception here, with the Al Qaeda-linked attacks in Madrid and London and the |
| 12:20 | teri-schultz | cells broken up in Germany and I am certain that we will hear more about terrorism as a political issue all the time. |
| 12:21 | GlobalPost | That's surprising that the head-of-state summit didn't have extra security. Of course, you never know. I once sat next to a US Homeland Security agent at a bar in Brussels who said that even though there seems to be less security than in Washington, there's more than meets the eye. |
| 12:21 | teri-schultz | Yeah -- think about all those cameras in the UK! |
| 12:21 | GlobalPost | However there’s often a perception that Europeans are “softer” on terror than the U.S. is. Do you see any evidence of that? |
| 12:22 | teri-schultz | I definitely think there's a different approach in Europe than in the U.S. and that's something they are proud of. I was just reading the |
| 12:22 | teri-schultz | counter-terrorism strategy and attention to human rights is reiterated constantly. |
| 12:23 | teri-schultz | Europe is anti-death penalty, anti-Guantanamo, anti-waterboarding, etc (sorry to have to over-generalize, but these are also discussed as policy at the EU level) |
| 12:24 | teri-schultz | and today when a high-ranking official from the Dept of Homeland Security had a lunch briefing with the EU justice ministers, three of four EU officials who briefed |
| 12:25 | teri-schultz | afterwards talked about the "cultural differences" in how the two sides view terrorism and counter-terrorism. One even used "clash"... |
| 12:25 | GlobalPost | And one ongoing disagreement between the EU and US related to security is privacy. Why has the EU has fought back against sharing bank-transfer information and airline-passenger data with the U.S. for the purposes of preventing terrorism? |
| 12:26 | teri-schultz | You answered the question: privacy! There's an enooooooormous difference in how EU citizens view what is acceptable to be done with their private data |
| 12:27 | teri-schultz | versus what Americans will tolerate. Even though U.S. authorities swore up and down that bank-transfer details are only subpoenaed and looked at if there is a |
| 12:28 | teri-schultz | well-documented reason to believe the transactions are terrorism-related, the European Parliament said that wasn't good enough. |
| 12:28 | +++ ChanServ has given op to gstout | |
| 12:28 | teri-schultz | There is a fear that every ATM withdrawal can be scrutinized by the Americans (who, frankly, are not trusted here because of "Patriot Act"-like provisions) and |
| 12:29 | teri-schultz | Europeans don't like that idea one bit. Same with the transfer of personal details every time a European gets on a flight to the U.S. They're fed up with that -- |
| 12:29 | teri-schultz | EVEN with increased terrorism threats. |
| 12:29 | GP-ChatHost | Okay, we have another question from the audience: |
| 12:29 | GP-ChatHost | How do ordinary people in Brussels feel about the security threat? What is the mood in the street? |
| 12:30 | teri-schultz | Here in Brussels, no noticeable difference. As the capital of the European Union, there are always a bunch of security guys milling about |
| 12:31 | teri-schultz | in front of the European Union headquarters and of course NATO headquarters are heavily guarded. But the Belgian government openly admitted it did |
| 12:32 | GlobalPost | And the US embassy is like a fortress (as they are in every country now). A fortress of Jersey barriers. |
| 12:32 | teri-schultz | not read the terrorism data in the same way as some other governments and was not going to increase security around the EU. I was frankly shocked by that! |
| 12:32 | teri-schultz | That's true -- U.S. embassies everywhere are always on high alert. |
| 12:32 | teri-schultz | Tourism officials have been grumbling a bit... |
| 12:33 | teri-schultz | but the average citizen I daresay has not paid much attention to the U.S. alert. |
| 12:33 | GlobalPost | Interesting. Will there ever be a meeting of the minds between the US and EU on terror -- since 9/11 didn't happen there? |
| 12:33 | teri-schultz | Ya know, I honestly don't think there will be. |
| 12:34 | teri-schultz | I'm glad I was able to watch a press conference this afternoon right after EU commissioners and ministers met with a DHS official to discuss the U.S. alert and |
| 12:35 | teri-schultz | even the counter-terrorism officials from Belgium (as the current EU president) and the EU were very easy to read in their difference of opinion about how |
| 12:36 | teri-schultz | terrorism information should be handled. They acknowledged that the threat is real but they definitely did not agree across the board that such an alert |
| 12:36 | teri-schultz | should be released to the public when there was not more specific information that could be shared, and in their minds, put to practical use. |
| 12:36 | GP-ChatHost | Okay, I think that's all we have time for today. |
| 12:36 | GP-ChatHost | Before we go, I have a special message for Barbara, our esteemed Europe editor (EEE), who served as "GlobalPost" for today's chat: |
| 12:36 | GP-ChatHost | Here goes: |
| 12:36 | GP-ChatHost | Happy Birthday to you, Happy Birthday to you, Happy Birthday dear Barbara, Happy Birthday to you!!!!! |
| 12:37 | GP-ChatHost | Thanks to everyone for joining us today! |
| 12:37 | teri-schultz | And everyone wish her a good night's sleep from her newborn boy!! |
| 12:37 | GP-ChatHost | Check back next week. |
| 12:37 | teri-schultz | Thanks everyone! |
| 12:37 | GlobalPost | Aw. The cake is on me! THanks all. And thanks Teri. |
| 12:37 | GP-ChatHost | We're hoping that Rumsfeld will reveal his/her true identity |
| 12:37 | GP-ChatHost | Meanwhile, Great job Teri. |
| 12:37 | teri-schultz | Please read my dispatch this week and leave more questions there...I'll check it! |
| 12:37 | GP-ChatHost | Keep up the good work in Brussels. |
| 12:37 | teri-schultz | Thanks -- a real pleasure. |
| 12:37 | GP-ChatHost | And great questions this week. |
| 12:37 | GP-ChatHost | If anyone in the audience has a suggestion for a chat topic |
| 12:38 | GP-ChatHost | you can email us at passport@globalpost.com |
| 12:38 | GP-ChatHost | That's it for now! |
| 12:38 | GP-ChatHost | Buh-bye |
| 12:39 | GlobalPost | P.S. Here's Teri's story if you have more questions: http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/france/101006/europe-terrorism-travel-advisory |
Got a question for a correspondent? Ask it directly. When members send us an email, we get a response from the field. members@globalpost.com

Follow us: