
Arsalla Rahmani in Kabul, June 2009. (Seamus Murphy)
Taliban leaders report progress in secret talks with the US and Afghanistan
Moderate Taliban make headway in negotiations with militants.
KABUL — Moderate leaders of the Taliban say they have quietly and steadily made progress in third-party talks between the active Taliban insurgency and representatives of the Afghan and U.S. governments.
Two Taliban leaders — who held high-ranking positions in the now-deposed Taliban government and who are directly involved in the talks — say they’ve recently established a framework of an agreement through the shuttle negotiations. They say the process has included contact with the spiritual leader of the Taliban, Mullah Mohammad Omar.
The talks began last year under the auspices of Saudi Arabia and have involved a series of secret meetings in Mecca, including a gathering several months ago. Observers have for months maintained that the Saudi talks have produced more rumors than real progress.
But now, in extensive interviews with GlobalPost two former Taliban officials directly involved — Abdul Hakim Muhajid and Arsalla Rahmani — said negotiations have gained momentum and laid the groundwork for real movement.
Rahmani went so far as to say a deal could be reached before Afghanistan’s August presidential elections. (Click here to listen to an interview on "The World" regarding this topic.)
Within the Taliban government that was toppled by the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan following the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, Rahmani held several cabinet postings as head of the Ministry of Higher Education and as minister of the Haj, or pilgrimage to Mecca. Muhajid and Rahmani said they have provided a “third party channel” to the Afghan government and had “limited” and “unofficial” contact with U.S. representatives.
The talks are built primarily around contacts within the Taliban’s still-underground leadership, including Mullah Omar, who is believed to be hiding in Quetta, Pakistan along with other clerical leaders of active insurgent wings. These other Taliban clerical leaders involved in the talks include Mullah Bradar, Mullah Mamsur and Mullah Abdul Jalil.
Also included in the negotiations is Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, the notorious renegade Afghan warlord whose active insurgency continues to fight against U.S. and coalition forces.
Two former Pakistani intelligence officials say a deal was underway in which Hekmatyar would call for an end to his insurgency and be allowed to live above ground in Saudi Arabia with a budget of $85 million. At least one Afghan government official confirmed that a deal with Hekmatyar was being assembled.
It is widely considered unlikely that the U.S. would accept any deal in which Mullah Omar or Hekmatyar is granted immunity from prosecution.
It is good that the Taliban is in talks with the United States. Even if it is off the record. Anything that will promote understanding is a step in the right direction.
Can someone please describe what "moderate Taliban" is?
Thanks,
F Drake
Gosh, a mature, non-judgmental attempt at discussions by an American government....what an improvement to what the world has suffered through for far too long. I hope we have the patience, knowledge, creativity, and vision to see this endeavor as a start of a very long road. The Taliban and Afghanistan as a country appear to perceive the world and people very differntly from western societies and we should not be attempting to "change" them. Rather, we should hope to develop positive, trusting contacts where mutual respect and mutual benefits are possible. Hopefully, they want to improve there infrastructure, education, and economic conditions, and in doing so, focused inward on their own development. We can only hope that over time, and probably, a very long time, their society may become a bit more accepting of equal rights for all of their poeple. Afghanistan has been at war for a long time. It would be beneficial for them to enter a long phase of re-construction and development. And it would be a first constructive step if the Taliban can develop neutral or positive relations with the western countries and not be a supporter of OBL. And by improving economic conditions in the country, there should be fewer recruits for OBL.
You write: "Observers here say the Taliban, and the Pashtuns as an ethnic group, have historically only negotiated from strength. An argument is made by some here that they have that strength now and may not be in as good a position once the U.S. military offensive kicks into gear over the next few months."
The leadership of the U.S. military, however, says the exact opposite! That the Taliban will never negotiate from a position of strength, only weakness, and this is supported by history.
Agreements are possible when negotiating from strength or weakness, of course. But the results tend to be quite different. The U.S. is not interesting in cutting a deal with the Taliban when it remains on the offensive -- is negotiating from a position -- because the cost would be higher than the U.S. is willing to accept. On the other hand, after the election and the traditional high-season for fighting, both the U.S. and the Taliban may have a realistic viewpoint of their strengths and weaknesses, and both may be more interested in a deal.
Yet, in a country where frequently switching sides and going back on your word is not seen as dishonorable and unmanly, what does an agreement with the Taliban mean? So the question becomes what can the U.S. do not only to cut a deal but to ensure the agreement holds?
From Kabul,
Stewart
Recent on Afghanistan:
Adventure travel: The Great Himalaya Trail?
Jason Overdorf - India - February 4, 2010 07:11 ET
Why walk Everest, K2, and other mountain giants? Because they are there.
Opinion: Fatal flaw to peace package in Afghanistan
Nushin Arbabzadah - Worldview - January 31, 2010 14:32 ET
The peace package that emerged from London Conference is doomed to fail, unless Kabul can get a monopoly on violence.
2 Afghanistan conferences: No solutions
Jean MacKenzie - Afghanistan - January 29, 2010 11:15 ET
Opinion: London and Prague meetings on Afghanistan do not produce new answers.
US, NATO want Dutch to stay in Afghanistan
Paul Ames - BeNeLux - January 28, 2010 07:17 ET
After deriding the Dutch mission to Afghanistan, the US now holds it up as an example.
Are Afghans really happy?
Jean MacKenzie - Afghanistan - January 24, 2010 11:34 ET
Western media talk of soaring optimism in Afghanistan. Afghans, when pressed, beg to differ.
Obama "magic" just another illusion
Jean MacKenzie - Worldview - January 20, 2010 07:26 ET
Analysis: To Afghans, the Obama administration has seemed uncertain, with promises sounding hollow.
How the US is attacking Taliban funding
Douglas Wissing - Afghanistan - January 20, 2010 07:14 ET
Official: Cracking down on Taliban funding is "like punching jello."
"It's a perfect war. Everybody makes money."
Douglas A. Wissing - Afghanistan - January 19, 2010 09:00 ET
How US military funds are ending up in the hands of the Taliban.
Taliban strike in central Kabul
Jean MacKenzie - Afghanistan - January 18, 2010 11:21 ET
Taliban gunmen and suicide bombers launched a brazen assault on the center of Kabul on Monday.
Opinion: Messages from Afghanistan
Marisa L. Porges - Worldview - January 18, 2010 07:07 ET
Without trust and understanding, counterinsurgency efforts are bound to fail — 30,000 more troops or not.
Good money after bad in Afghanistan?
Jean MacKenzie - Afghanistan - January 18, 2010 06:49 ET
Poppy planting is down, but graft is up. So why is the U.S. mimicking a British agriculture program in Helmand?
On patrol in enemy territory
Ben Gilbert - Afghanistan - December 27, 2009 12:33 ET
Afghanistan's wild wild west
Ben Gilbert - Afghanistan - December 27, 2009 11:18 ET
Welcome to the “Heart of Darkness,” where the militants rule and most Afghans are stuck between the Taliban and U.S. troops.
Analysis: Is Germany fighting a "war" in Afghanistan?
Cameron Abadi - Germany - December 21, 2009 08:49 ET
German Defense Minister zu Guttenberg may have gotten more than he bargained for by opening debate on Afghanistan.
On the road with "Dog Company"
Ben Gilbert - Afghanistan - December 17, 2009 06:34 ET
The Taliban may be increasingly elusive but cilantro is surprisingly easy to find, says one band of patrolling US troops.
Opinion: The Taliban is keeping time
Sam Kiley - Worldview - December 15, 2009 11:43 ET
With a thriving opium industry in Afghanistan, Obama's troop surge has no hope of success.
USAID: Understaffed and overwhelmed in Afghanistan
C.M. Sennott - Afghanistan - December 11, 2009 12:12 ET
Obama's troop surge fails to address how to improve delivery of aid.
Opinion: Obama defines the use of war in an age of terror
C.M. Sennott - Worldview - December 10, 2009 11:43 ET
Obama's Nobel acceptance speech was a self-effacing and deeply personal exploration of "just war."
Opinion: Where in the world is Osama bin Laden?
Michael Goldfarb - Worldview - December 9, 2009 06:48 ET
Do we even want to know? Is it possible that limbo is the easiest place for him to be?
Watch GlobalPost videos:
Reporter's Notebook
President Obama has studiously avoided the term "war on terror" from the moment he was sworn in. You don't need to watch Fox News for long...Read more >
GlobalPost invites you to listen to "This Year with Global Post," a special radio report in partnership with WGBH-Boston on how our...Read more >
It's straight out of Orwell. The Cuban government of Raul Castro has kept up the repression of the Cuban people through a Criminal Code known as...Read more >
Featured: Special Projects
Oceans:
Assessing their health
After the Fall:
20 years since the Berlin Wall came down
Life, Death and the Taliban:
Videos and stories
Study Abroad:
Students report from the road
Living in the Shadows:
An intimate look at China's migrant workers
A World of Trouble:
The global economy in 20 hotspots









Comments:
7 Comments.
Login or Register to post comments