Workers load bags of food aid from the U.S. during food loading operations in Quetta back in 2001. USAID has recently initiated a probe into accusations that the Taliban takes its money meant for large development projects, like roads and bridges. (Reuters)

Are US taxpayers funding the Taliban?

DiggThis

USAID probes the possibility that contractors give a cut to the Taliban.

By Jean MacKenzie - GlobalPost
Published: September 2, 2009 19:56 ET

KABUL — The United States Agency for International Development has opened an investigation into allegations that its funds for road and bridge construction in Afghanistan are ending up in the hands of the Taliban, through a protection racket for contractors.

And House Foreign Affairs Committee member, Rep. Bill Delahunt (D-Mass.) vowed to hold hearings on the issue in the fall, saying: "The idea that American taxpayer dollars are ending up with the Taliban is a case for grave concern."

U.S. officials confirmed that the preliminary investigation and the proposed hearings were sparked by a GlobalPost special report on the funding of the Taliban last month that uncovered a process that has been an open secret in Afghanistan for years among those in international aid organizations. 

The report exposed that the Taliban takes a percentage of the billions of dollars in aid from U.S. and other international coalition members that goes to large organizations and their subcontractors for development projects, in exchange for protection in remote areas controlled by the insurgency. 

“We are looking into this. We are always interested in fraud, waste and abuse,” said Dona Dinkler, the chief of staff for congressional affairs at USAID’s Office of Inspector General in Washington, D.C.  

But, she added: “It’s a real hard thing to prove. Who is going to survive to testify about that?  That is our challenge. But that doesn’t mean we stop trying. We want to get to the bottom of it.”

The USAID probe is underway in tandem with an inquiry by the U.S. House of Representatives' Foreign Affairs Committee, whose members have raised concerns in recent years about fraud and abuse in the $7.5 billion in funds marked for Afghanistan between 2002 and this year.

"It's our intention this fall to hold public hearings on it. We will pursue this with vigor," said committee member Delahunt.

Delahunt said the allegations made in the story reveal a lack of oversight of U.S. government spending in Afghanistan that he described as a legacy of the previous administration in Washington. He said more resources were needed to be brought to routing out this kind of corruption.

USAID’s Inspector General has only one investigator in Afghanistan and two auditors tracking the billions of tax payers’ dollars that go to NGOs in that troubled country.

“They want to know what [we are] going to do about this,” said an official at the U.S. Embassy in Kabul, adding that the goal of the probe at this point is to determine how extensive the problem is, and how it can be tracked.

As part of a special report called "Life, Death and the Taliban," GlobalPost traced a web of financial connections between major international contractors and the Taliban in which the insurgents provide protection — largely from themselves — in return for a healthy cut of the proceeds. One source, with direct knowledge of such payments, estimated the Taliban can take upwards of 20 percent from many contracts awarded in unstable areas, which would include about half of the country.

When the money is not paid out, then bridges get blown up, engineers get kidnapped and projects tend to stall, according to sources quoted in the story.

Comments:

4 Comments.

Login or Register to post comments

Posted by elena louisa on September 3, 2009 15:31 ET

International NGOs operating in Afghanistan are, for the most part, free from the corruption that is mentioned in this article. Attention should be given to the multitude of contractors that are implementing road and bridge and other huge and costly infrastructure projects.

Posted by Rapier on September 3, 2009 16:03 ET

Not at all surprising. See "Afghanistan - What next?"

http://ofthisandthat.org/Commentary.html

Posted by INEVITABLY on September 7, 2009 17:35 ET

The facts are always undeniable no doubt but the circumstances make it hard to accept the truth and compels to compromise with the realities on ground.

Hope no further elaboration is needed to realize the mistakes committed on the very first instance. Vital points were not properly assessed particularly the political & military strategies in relation with the personal equation of the heads of the two neighboring countries in addition failure to utilize the utility value of the person having good relation with Taliban.

The President had been intentionally placed in a false position by the outgoing President to have posed as a silent observer at the ousting of the then President of Pakistan because of false reports prepared at the behest of some interested elites of the ruling party and also with the support of the opposition.

The best way out would be to seek help from ex-President General Musharraf and consult him for a honorable solution of the issue without further delay and before the matter escalates further and slips beyond control.

Present Karzai government may not like the proposition. Therefore, the mater has to be kept secret, from both Pakistan and Afghanistan even from the new Afghan government.

Posted by Sig on September 17, 2009 12:20 ET

Does anybodyelse think it odd that this "reporter" really works for a NGO in Afghanistan that lists USAID on it's website as a donor?

Recent on Afghanistan:

Adventure travel: The Great Himalaya Trail?

Jason Overdorf - India - February 4, 2010 07:11 ET

Why walk Everest, K2, and other mountain giants? Because they are there.

Opinion: Fatal flaw to peace package in Afghanistan

Nushin Arbabzadah - Worldview - January 31, 2010 14:32 ET

The peace package that emerged from London Conference is doomed to fail, unless Kabul can get a monopoly on violence.

2 Afghanistan conferences: No solutions

Jean MacKenzie - Afghanistan - January 29, 2010 11:15 ET

Opinion: London and Prague meetings on Afghanistan do not produce new answers.

US, NATO want Dutch to stay in Afghanistan

Paul Ames - BeNeLux - January 28, 2010 07:17 ET

After deriding the Dutch mission to Afghanistan, the US now holds it up as an example.

Are Afghans really happy?

Jean MacKenzie - Afghanistan - January 24, 2010 11:34 ET

Western media talk of soaring optimism in Afghanistan. Afghans, when pressed, beg to differ.

Obama "magic" just another illusion

Jean MacKenzie - Worldview - January 20, 2010 07:26 ET

Analysis: To Afghans, the Obama administration has seemed uncertain, with promises sounding hollow.

How the US is attacking Taliban funding

Douglas Wissing - Afghanistan - January 20, 2010 07:14 ET

Official: Cracking down on Taliban funding is "like punching jello."

"It's a perfect war. Everybody makes money."

Douglas A. Wissing - Afghanistan - January 19, 2010 09:00 ET

How US military funds are ending up in the hands of the Taliban.

Taliban strike in central Kabul

Jean MacKenzie - Afghanistan - January 18, 2010 11:21 ET

Taliban gunmen and suicide bombers launched a brazen assault on the center of Kabul on Monday.

Opinion: Messages from Afghanistan

Marisa L. Porges - Worldview - January 18, 2010 07:07 ET

Without trust and understanding, counterinsurgency efforts are bound to fail — 30,000 more troops or not.

Good money after bad in Afghanistan?

Jean MacKenzie - Afghanistan - January 18, 2010 06:49 ET

Poppy planting is down, but graft is up. So why is the U.S. mimicking a British agriculture program in Helmand?

On patrol in enemy territory

Ben Gilbert - Afghanistan - December 27, 2009 12:33 ET

Afghanistan's wild wild west

Ben Gilbert - Afghanistan - December 27, 2009 11:18 ET

Welcome to the “Heart of Darkness,” where the militants rule and most Afghans are stuck between the Taliban and U.S. troops.

Analysis: Is Germany fighting a "war" in Afghanistan?

Cameron Abadi - Germany - December 21, 2009 08:49 ET

German Defense Minister zu Guttenberg may have gotten more than he bargained for by opening debate on Afghanistan.

On the road with "Dog Company"

Ben Gilbert - Afghanistan - December 17, 2009 06:34 ET

The Taliban may be increasingly elusive but cilantro is surprisingly easy to find, says one band of patrolling US troops.

Opinion: The Taliban is keeping time

Sam Kiley - Worldview - December 15, 2009 11:43 ET

With a thriving opium industry in Afghanistan, Obama's troop surge has no hope of success.

USAID: Understaffed and overwhelmed in Afghanistan

C.M. Sennott - Afghanistan - December 11, 2009 12:12 ET

Obama's troop surge fails to address how to improve delivery of aid.

Opinion: Obama defines the use of war in an age of terror

C.M. Sennott - Worldview - December 10, 2009 11:43 ET

Obama's Nobel acceptance speech was a self-effacing and deeply personal exploration of "just war."

Opinion: Where in the world is Osama bin Laden?

Michael Goldfarb - Worldview - December 9, 2009 06:48 ET

Do we even want to know? Is it possible that limbo is the easiest place for him to be?