
College students shout and burn Pakistan's national flags during a protest against Mumbai's recent attacks, in the western Indian city of Ahmedabad Dec. 5, 2008. Several attackers may have survived the three-day siege of Mumbai that killed 171 people last week, analysts said. (Amit Dave/Reuters)
For Which It Stands: India
Decoding Obama's (increasingly) complex India problem
NEW DELHI — Like many countries, India was rooting hard for Barack Obama to become America's 44th president. But the enormous challenges that Obama faces in South Asia — and India's huge expectations — could make the love affair short-lived.
Since former President Bill Clinton's second term, U.S.-India ties have been growing ever closer. With the nuclear agreement signed in September, the relationship has begun to look like a strategic alliance.
But that warm embrace could turn into a cold shoulder. The rub: Obama's commitment to building a viable state from the rubble of Afghanistan, which will likely lead him to lean on Pakistan for assistance.
Indians worry that the U.S. may allow Pakistan to wriggle out of its espoused promises to arrest and prosecute the terrorists responsible for the Nov. 26 attacks in Mumbai.

"We expect the U.S. to apply the same strict standards that they have for the western border of Pakistan for Pakistan-sponsored terrorism against India," said former foreign minister Yashwant Sinha.
"The litmus test for this will be the surrender or repatriation to India of those criminals who have taken shelter in Pakistan, and no alibi by the Pakistani rulers should be allowed to stand in the way," he added.
India has banked heavily on America's ability to pressure Pakistan to bring the Mumbai culprits to justice. But the U.S. needs the Pakistani army's help in fighting the Taliban on Pakistan's western border.
If in return the U.S. allows Islamabad to skate on its promises to catch and prosecute the perpetrators of the Mumbai attack, India's love affair with Obama would come to a speedy end.
And it could well reverse the trajectory of India's increasingly U.S.-centric foreign
policy — which has seen New Delhi step back from Iran, inch closer to Israel and distance itself from the Shanghai Cooperation's Russia-China-India formulation in favor of a budding alliance with the U.S., Japan and Australia.
"President Bush has left a very strong legacy of establishing a strategic relationship between India and the United States and President Obama will have to find ways and means to consolidate that relationship and build on it," said Kanwal Sibal, a former India foreign secretary.
"However, (Obama's) thinking about Afghanistan and what the United States needs to do there — the surge strategy that is being propounded by Gen. Petraeus — will require certain tough policy decisions vis a vis Pakistan," Sibal added.
Pakistan has maneuvered U.S. intervention after the Mumbai attacks into an effort to stop India from taking action, rather than compelling Pakistan to do so, according to M.K. Bhadrakumar, a career Indian diplomat.
That has already "exposed the fallacy" of India's thinking that in the post-Cold War world it is a natural ally of the U.S., while the U.S. relationship with Pakistan is a mere marriage of convenience, said Bhadrakumar.
And when Obama takes office, the rhetoric of putting pressure on Pakistan to arrest terror suspects will likely give way to a multibillion-dollar aid package, including $300 million in annual military aid for the next five years.
"That gives Pakistan a misplaced confidence that they can get away with terrorist acts against India. That the world will watch for awhile, then remain quiet and wait for the next strike, and India will be helpless to act," Sinha said.
"Mumbai, with the kind of deep hurt it has caused to the Indian psyche, is making India increasingly unwilling to accept this situation," he added.
So far, Obama's early efforts at developing a strategy for balancing America's complex dual alliance with India and Pakistan have appeared to Indians like naive blunders that play into Pakistan's hands.
According to U.S. media reports, for instance, Obama suggested he might appoint former President Clinton as special envoy to Kashmir as part of an effort to resolve India-Pakistan tensions, freeing Pakistan to be more aggressive in fighting al-Qaida on the Afghan border.
That might sound like a good idea to non-Indian readers.
But to most Indians, the suggestion betrays either a basic ignorance or a deliberate oversight of India's point of view: that Kashmir is a bilateral issue in which it occupies the literal and the moral high ground.
India has trumpeted the fact that despite the attacks on Mumbai and a call for a boycott by separatists, more than 60 percent of eligible voters turned out for state elections held in Kashmir in November and December, and the clear majority chose pro-India parties.
Pakistan's chief argument against the legitimacy of India's dominion over Kashmir is that India has never held the plebiscite to determine who will have sovereignty over the state that the U.N. Security Council ordered as part of the original peace plan for the region in 1948.
"The inherent message that you get from this is that by appointing a special envoy, the United States would want India to make additional compromises," Sibal said.
"That is where the rub is," Sibal continued. "What additional compromises? Because we have a purely defensive strategy on Kashmir. It's Pakistan that has the offensive strategy, which wants to grab part of the territory, which wants to destabilize the situation from within, which is engaging in terrorism."
Though India remains skeptical, the latest news out of Pakistan has been relatively positive.
Under increasing U.S. pressure as the FBI progresses in its own investigation of the Mumbai attacks, Islamabad has at least acknowledged that the terrorist in Indian custody is a Pakistani national.
What remains to be seen is whether Obama's administration will be as forceful in dealing with Islamabad at the beginning of his term as Bush suddenly seemed to be in his final days in office — when he knew his successor would have to deal with the consequences.
For Indians, the answer could define the Obama presidency almost before it begins.
Jason says Obama's suggestion of solving Kashmir sounds to reasonable to any non-Indians, but not to Indians. While it is a fact, it comes across implying Indians do not see reasonable way of resolving this issue. There are two components to the explanation why Indians don't agree with Obama.
1. It's all in the way problem is defined.
For Americans, they have an Afghanistan problem. They need Pakistan to help them. Pakistanis say unresolved Kashmir is breeding terrorists. So ever reasonable and logical Americans agree. Ergo, Kashmir is the root cause.
For Pakistanis, they have India problem. India just refuses to give up Kashmir and other Muslim territories. Since India continues to be big and thus threating against their desire, they need "strategic depth" in Afghanistan and thus they have interest there. If India gives up Kashmir, Hyderabad, Sircreek, Siachin, river disputes and generally accept green flag on Red Fort, then they may not need to meddle in Afghanistan.
Indians have a Pakistan problem. They see Pakistan as an abomination, a deep and offensive scar on their motherland. They never accepted religion based partition and they are not going to allow another one now by giving up Kashmir or any other Muslim majority areas. They need Pakistan to get off its neighbors and some grand design of major islamic power and set its house in order.
I hope Jason's non-Indians ever understood this basic difference between perspectives. Hopefully, this explains why Indians are not as brain-dead as Jason implies.
2. As I pointed above, Indian point of view is that countries and people can't be divided based on religion especially when they have a record of generally peaceful life over millennia. If Kashmir is resolved, Pakistanis have a backlog of religion based demands hangover from Partition.
It is said that civil war is still fought in the American South after more than 100 years. Why is so surprising for Americans that India and Pakistan are still playing Partition? It is annoying to see perfectly intelligent Americans play dumb when it comes to other peoples' identity and interests.
To be sure, general Indian perception is that Obama administration is going to be bad for India despite their fascination with Obama. The topics are non-proliferation, outsourcing, going protectionist after decades of patronizing advice about free trade, appeasing Pakistan with all too evident ineffective billions of aid. Buckle up.
Recent on India :
How can 39 million buffalo be wrong?
Jason Overdorf - India - November 19, 2009 06:30 ET
Indian farmers discover the beauty of mozzarella.
Silicon Sweatshops: A promising model
Jonathan Adams and Kathleen E. McLaughlin - China and its neighbors - November 18, 2009 06:54 ET
There's no easy way to police supply chains in Asia. But one US high-tech firm and its Taiwan supplier are taking a creative approach that might just work.
Special report: Silicon Sweatshops
Jonathan Adams and Kathleen E. McLaughlin - China and its neighbors - November 17, 2009 15:05 ET
Despite strict "codes of conduct," labor rights violations are the norm at factories making the world's favorite high-tech gadgets.
What do you think about Silicon Sweatshops?
News Desk - China and its neighbors - November 17, 2009 15:04 ET
Are high-tech supply chains in Asia good business or exploitation? You decide.
Silicon Sweatshops: Shattered dreams
Jonathan Adams - China and its neighbors - November 17, 2009 07:24 ET
Migrant workers making gadgets at Taiwan's high-tech parks sign deals that make them modern-day indentured servants.
Silicon Sweatshops: The China connection
Kathleen E. McLaughlin and Jonathan Adams - China and its neighbors - November 17, 2009 07:22 ET
For migrant workers, an electronics factory job can be a ticket into China's booming middle class. But for many, it turns into a nightmare of poor working conditions and indifferent bosses.
Silicon Sweatshops: Disposable workforce
Jonathan Adams - China and its neighbors - November 17, 2009 07:22 ET
Laid-off Taiwanese workers accuse their firm of violating industry codes even when times were good.
On Location: Haryana — India's looming food crisis
Jason Overdorf - India - November 12, 2009 16:45 ET
Can the "Lungs of Bombay" be given space to breathe?
Sara Stefanini - Global Green - November 12, 2009 13:33 ET
Called upon to plant trees, Mumbaikars join the historic fight to preserve Sanjay Gandhi National Park.
It's not about the monks
Jason Overdorf - India - November 9, 2009 22:15 ET
China's saber rattling sends India into a funk — by design.
The asses of New Delhi
Jason Overdorf - India - November 5, 2009 05:41 ET
With a year to go before hosting the Commonwealth Games, Delhi targets the poor. Its donkeys, too.
Mt. Everest's "other guy"
Jason Overdorf - India - November 1, 2009 09:47 ET
In the hills surrounding Darjeeling, West Bengal, the people worship second place.
In India, C-sections are in the stars
Mridu Khullar - India - October 31, 2009 06:00 ET
When's that baby due? The astrologer knows.
Interview: India's Foreign Minister S.M. Krishna
Saritha Rai - India - October 29, 2009 15:37 ET
What does a rising power think about China, Obama, the Taliban, Pakistan, Afghanistan and more?
Water woes: Too much of a good thing
Ann Tornkvist - India - October 25, 2009 08:19 ET
Photo essay: India is suffering its worst drought in 20 years. But not everywhere.
China, China everywhere
Thomas Mucha - Commerce - October 24, 2009 08:49 ET
We're all living in China's world now. How's your Mandarin?
CEO pay in India: "Vulgar and indecent"
Saritha Rai - India - October 21, 2009 05:49 ET
What's Hindi for fat cat?
In India, plagiarism is on the rise
Shailaja Neelakantan - India - October 18, 2009 08:30 ET
Publish, perish or pilfer?
India: The next Detroit?
Saritha Rai - India - October 16, 2009 15:17 ET
Automakers worldwide ramp up production on the subcontinent.
Watch GlobalPost videos:
Reporter's Notebook
An interesting note from India's Business Standard newspaper: the U.S. president's emergency plan for AIDS relief (Pepfar) depends almost wholly on...Read more >
It ain't easy running an airline these days. Fuel prices see-saw. Nobody wants to travel. You have to take off your shoes every five minutes. And...Read more >
A 22-year-old Indian guy was shot this weekend for pissing in public, according to a report from the staid old BBC. Nope, this isn't...Read more >
Featured: Special Projects
After the Fall:
20 years since the Berlin Wall came down
Life, Death and the Taliban:
Videos and stories
Study Abroad:
Students report from the road
Living in the Shadows:
An intimate look at China's migrant workers
A World of Trouble:
The global economy in 20 hotspots
Global Blogs:





Comments:
1 Comments.
Login or Register to post comments