
A protester shouts slogans against the U.S. during a demostration in front of the U.S. Embassy in Ankara, Turkey on Oct. 10, 2007. At the time, the U.S. House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee was about to consider a resolution recognizing the 1915 massacres of Armenians as genocide. The head of the Turkish army warned that if the committee put H.R. 106 to a vote, U.S.-Turkey military ties “would never be the same.” (Umit Bektas/Reuters)
For Which It Stands: Turkey
Turks cast a wary eye on Obama's position on the Armenian question.
ISTANBUL — The day after the U.S. election I received an email with the subject line: “PRISON SENTENCE FOR UP TO 15 YEARS FOR OBAMA.”
The message came from a Turkish human rights organization and contained an imaginary legal complaint — caustically satirical, like much Turkish political commentary — detailing how Obama could be charged under article 305 of the Turkish penal code for violating Turkey’s national interests.
His offense? Using the word genocide to describe the massacre of Armenians in Ottoman Turkey in 1915. In Turkey, the killings are officially considered accidents of war. A century later, the battle between Turks and Armenians worldwide over what to call them has become a central issue in U.S.-Turkish relations.
Over the past two years, in Turkish media coverage of the U.S. elections, each candidate’s position on the Armenian issue was discussed — before Iraq, before the PKK (the Kurdistan Workers Party), before Cyprus, Iran, or the economy.

Hillary Clinton? “Supporter of the Armenian plan” (Zaman, April 7, 2007). McCain? “Refused to bow to Armenian demands” (Today’s Zaman, Feb. 21, 2008). Giuliani? “Courting the Armenians” (Turkish Daily News Jan. 7, 2007). Huckabee and Romney? “Not close to Armenian groups” (Turkish Daily News Jan 17, 2008). As November approached hardly a day went by without an election story in one of the major papers mentioning the Armenian issue.
At stake — other than national psychology — is U.S. House Resolution 106, which calls on the president to recognize the Ottoman-era massacres of Armenians as genocide. It is a label Turkey considers so unacceptable that in October 2007 the head of the Turkish army warned that if the House Foreign Affairs Committee put H.R. 106 to a vote, U.S.-Turkey military ties “would never be the same.” The resolution froze.
Yet Obama’s support of the resolution has been unambiguous. In January 2008, he delivered a statement to Armenian-American groups: “As a senator, I strongly support passage of the Armenian genocide resolution and as president I will recognize the Armenian genocide.”
As if that weren’t enough to sink a candidate’s reputation here, the day Obama announced Joseph Biden as his running mate, Hurriyet, one of the largest daily papers, wrote that Biden’s views on the Armenian issue were “anti-Turkish.” The paper treated Biden’s views on Iraq as a mere footnote.
That the Armenian issue got more election airtime than Iraq was astonishing not only because one conflict is ongoing and the other took place a century ago, but because Turks’ anger over Iraq has led to rampant anti-Americanism here. According to the Pew Global Attitudes survey, between 1999 and 2007 the percentage of Turks with favorable views of the U.S. dropped from 52 percent to 9 percent. Among 23 countries surveyed, Turkey ranked as feeling least favorable toward the U.S.
Despite all this, Turks have not been immune to Obama’s charms. In between discussion of the candidates’ genocide views, columnists also waxed romantic about how Obama gave hope to all those who “felt black” in the world. When the election results were in, they heaped rare admiration on America for transcending its history of racial inequality.
Villagers near Van, in southeastern Turkey, sacrificed 44 sheep for the 44th president and held up blood-smeared signs that said “You are one of us.” Akif Emre, a columnist in the conservative Turkish newspaper Yeni Safak, wrote on Nov. 5: “Obama’s victory reminds me of the most successful aspects of the American system: the mentality that means that in the name of facing up to your history, you apologize to history and not shrug off your responsibilities.”
Although he was talking about America, he might as well have been referring to his own country. The notion of confronting history has lately entered public discussion here like never before.
In December, a group of prominent Turkish intellectual figures announced a campaign called “We Apologize,” and put forth the following statement: "My conscience does not accept the insensitivity showed to and the denial of the Great Catastrophe that the Ottoman Armenians were subjected to in 1915. I reject this injustice and for my share, I empathize with the feelings and pain of my Armenian brothers and sisters. I apologize to them."
Visitors to the “We Apologize” website can add their names to the statement. Almost 30,000 Turks have done so in the month since the campaign was launched. Prime Minister Erdogan, not so moved, stated wryly that perhaps those who felt it necessary to apologize had carried out genocide, but that Turkey had no such problem. President Gul, more diplomatic, called the initiative an example of freedom of speech but stopped short of supporting it.
Meanwhile, Turks debated whether the apology campaign would be seen as a concession of guilt or whether it might instead serve to convince Washington that the 1915 debate was taking care of itself and congressional involvement was not necessary. Instead of “How does Obama feel about the Armenian issue?” the question has become “Will Obama keep his word about H.R. 106?” If he does not, he will not be the first U.S. president to renege on this particular promise. Even President Bush vowed to acknowledge the genocide before his election in 2000.
There is no doubt that several other issues, especially the U.S. presence in Iraq, U.S. cooperation in fighting the PKK, and now the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, are vital to Turks.
Yet it is this old story from the last century that endures. A few weeks after the election, columnist Omer Taspinar wrote in Today’s Zaman that “[the Armenian] issue will sadly dominate the next few months in Turkish-American relations.”
(For further anaysis, read two recently released articles on anti-Semitism in Turkey and Turkey's relationship with the West, commissioned by The German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF) for its series On Turkey.)
Thanks for the report, with the continuing concentration on the responsibility for the Armenian Massacare...why is it that the current Ankara government (or past or future) can't simply say that these crimes were committed by the Ottomans, not the modern Turkish state, condemn the Ottomans, and move forward?
I guess I am asking why the modern Turkish state cares so much about denying the facts of the massacare, and penalizing those who bring it up publicly? What is the tie to the Ottoman past and not the future the Young Turks and Attaturk brought to Turkey?
Tom
Meline,
It will however be interesting to see how Obama reacts to astonishing momentum in efforts to normalize ties between Armenia and Turkey. Senior officials here in Yerevan are saying that the border could be open to some extent this year even, and if not, in 2010.
Meanwhile, the Armenian president and foreign minister have said they are not against the creation of a commission to finally put an end to this long running debate.
Basically, because it is important for Turkey to own up to its own past, and for diplomatic relations to be established between Yerevan and Ankara, I'm wondering if Obama won't instead consider this opportunity too important to risk.
Instead, encouragement of both sides to resolve their own differences might seem more logical. One U.S.-Armenian analyst suggests that Obama will tread carefully and not alienate Turkey, but might allow Congress to freely vote on the matter, for example.
Of course, when that would be is another matter. Dunno, every presidential candidate promises to recognize the genocide but never does because Turkey is too strategically important.
Meanwhile, if relations are improving on an unprecedented scale between the two countries, will Obama risk unleashing a nationalist backlash in Turkey that might stop that in its tracks?
Let's see.
---
Onnik Krikorian
Recent on Turkey :
Opinion: It's getting chilly between Turkey and Israel
HDS Greenway - Worldview - October 25, 2009 10:10 ET
As Turkey gets friendlier with Syria and Iraq, relations with Israel take a back seat.
In Kas, reminders of a gilded age
Nichole Sobecki - Turkey - October 20, 2009 15:54 ET
An ancient Turkish port town reluctantly offers itself up to the tourist trade.
Kas — city of ancient charms
Nichole Sobecki - Turkey - October 20, 2009 05:50 ET
Armenia and Turkey — not so fast
David L. Stern - Turkey - October 14, 2009 17:28 ET
Obstacles to reopening the two countries' border include Azerbaijan, parliamentary approval and the weight of history.
Normalizing Armenia-Turkey relations
Nichole Sobecki - Turkey - October 11, 2009 10:27 ET
The two sides have signed an historic — but shaky — accord re-establishing diplomatic ties.
Turks ponder — and protest — any IMF deal
Nichole Sobecki - Turkey - October 2, 2009 06:45 ET
As the world lender heads to Istanbul for its summit, Ankara weighs the merits of a multibillion-dollar loan.
Opening the "death wells" of Turkey
Nichole Sobecki - Turkey - September 30, 2009 10:03 ET
An investigation into a shadowy force suspected of killing PKK supporters has shed light on a recent dark chapter in Turkey's past.
G20 Pittsburgh: They meet again
Michael Goldfarb - Worldview - September 22, 2009 06:13 ET
Opinion: The world does not hold its breath.
Opinion: The Turkey-Armenia detente
Ian O. Lesser - Worldview - September 5, 2009 10:11 ET
Why it's good news for the region and the US.
Turkey's identity dilemma
Nichole Sobecki - Turkey - September 4, 2009 08:04 ET
A push to expand the rights of Kurds has rattled the foundations of the modern Turkish state.
Turkey sees merit in jailing children
Nichole Sobecki - Turkey - August 28, 2009 10:03 ET
The case of a 16-year-old jailed for attending a protest highlights the harshness of the country's penal code.
Children behind bars
Nichole Sobecki - Turkey - August 26, 2009 16:43 ET
Turkey’s long, unrequited quest
Cameron Abadi - Turkey - August 20, 2009 14:59 ET
As Iceland eyes quick EU entry, is Europe too racist and Islamophobic to welcome its eastern neighbor into the fold?
All aboard the Anatolia 'Express'
Nichole Sobecki - Turkey - August 16, 2009 21:20 ET
It isn't fast, but the Güney Expresi affords passengers a view of another Turkey altogether.
Meet the economic gangsters
Mark Scheffler - Commerce - August 12, 2009 09:03 ET
Economic gangsters come in all shapes and sizes — they're Asian dictators and Somali pirates.
Saving Istanbul's skid row
Nichole Sobecki - Turkey - August 3, 2009 17:15 ET
Landmines must go, but how?
Nichole Sobecki - Turkey - August 2, 2009 08:06 ET
Turkey has thousands of landmines on its border with Syria. Will it sacrifice national sovereignty to get rid of them?
Turkish game show a leap of faith
Nichole Sobecki - Turkey - August 1, 2009 12:06 ET
Convert to religion and win! That's the premise of a new show offering a vacation with every salvation.
Saving Istanbul's skid row
Constanze Letsch - Turkey - July 31, 2009 10:05 ET
The battle lines are drawn over the city's planned "improvements" to a notorious neighborhood.
Watch GlobalPost videos:
Reporter's Notebook
An American friend got stuck in traffic on her way to my house in central Istanbul, where I was watching the inauguration with a very excited group....Read more >
Featured: Special Projects
After the Fall:
20 years since the Berlin Wall came down
Life, Death and the Taliban:
Videos and stories
Study Abroad:
Students report from the road
Living in the Shadows:
An intimate look at China's migrant workers
A World of Trouble:
The global economy in 20 hotspots
Global Blogs:







Comments:
2 Comments.
Login or Register to post comments