American jazz musician Miles Davis during rehersals for an episode of "Robert Herridge Theater" titled "The Sound of Miles Davis" in New York City April 2, 1959. (CBS Photo Archive/Getty Images)

For Which It Stands: Commerce

Obama's economists are great, but can Barack channel Miles Davis?

By Thomas Mucha
Published: January 4, 2009 13:06 ET
Updated: January 30, 2009 19:06 ET

As Barack Obama is about to find out, all-star teams can be funny things. Fortunately, he has some history to guide him.
 
In the mid-1960s Miles Davis molded Wayne Shorter, Herbie Hancock, Ron Carter and Tony Williams — musical legends all — into one of the greatest quintets in jazz history. Their collective artistry was second only to Miles’ previous band, which used the same all-star approach to produce "A Kind of Blue," the best selling jazz record of all time and one I’ve heard played in Beijing, Bangalore, Cairo, London, rural Mexico and other far-flung places.
 
Basketball offers another hopeful lesson. In 1992, under the invisible hand of coach Chuck Daly the U.S. “Dream Team” seized the Olympic gold medal with an average winning margin of 43.8 points, and with Daly not once needing to call a timeout.
 
In both cases these effective leaders put together supremely talented teams. But then, critically, they made their stars align.
 
Click here to go to the For Which It Stands Complete Guide
 
Conjuring greatness, of course, is rare. And for every all-star triumph there’s disaster waiting to happen: think the Warren Beatty-Dustin Hoffman debacle "Ishtar," or more ominiously for Obama, Kennedy's coterie of the "best and brightest" who dreamed up that young president's Vietnam policy.
 
The dangers are everywhere: ego, pride, ambition, internecine feuds, miscommunication and mixed messages.
 
That brings us to our current predicament, the worst global economic crisis since the Great Depression.
 
Obama’s economic posse is a dream team by any measure. They’re the Keynesian equivalent of John Coltrane’s tenor or Charles Barkley’s elbow. These are talented, smart, and original thinkers.
 
There’s prickly Larry Summers in the White House, serene Timothy Geithner at Treasury (provided he survives the nomination process), stingy Peter Orszag overseeing the Congressional Budget Office and professorial Christina Romer heading up the Council of Economic Advisers. There’s also the respected Paul Volcker leading a new Economic Recovery Advisory Board under the daily direction of brainy University of Chicago economist and Obama confidante Austan Goolsbee.
 
But here’s the question: Can the incoming President — who is, happily, a fan of Miles Davis and who, conveniently, sports a wicked jump shot — make this stellar economic team perform its own feats of greatness?
 
So far, the signs are promising. And they do hint at the Miles mode of leadership, which expertly mixed a variety of talents and voices.
 
President-elect Obama has clearly gone for smarts, competence, and a global outlook. But most importantly, he’s picked advisers with the right experience.
 
While working at Treasury in the late 1990s, Summers and Geithner helped manage several similar global economic problems, including the Asian financial crisis, Russia's bond default and Mexico's devaluation of the peso. Geithner’s globalist street cred is especially strong: he's studied Japanese and Chinese and has lived in Japan, China, Thailand, India and Zimbabwe.
 
These economists also both know how to get bureaucratic wheels moving, and how to work with other countries — ideal skills for the current global crisis.
 
Romer, meanwhile, is known for her academic expertise of the Great Depression — scary, but useful knowledge in today’s White House.
 
And as a former Federal Reserve Chairman under presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan, Volcker is hard-wired to resist the political pressure and pork that can lead to bad economic policy.
 
Accordingly, Obama’s team is winning near-universal praise. “The most important issue is that they know how to make government work,” University of Chicago international political economist Marvin Zonis and a colleague of Goolsbee, told me. “They know how to deal with what is a global financial and economic crisis.”
 
They had better. The speed and severity of this crisis, which began in the United States and is spreading around the world should scare anyone, all-star or not.
 
The U.S. economy — which produces 25 percent of global output — is expected to shrink for at least three straight quarters, a feat not seen in a half-century. Unemployment is already at a 16-year high. Consumer confidence has fallen to a 40-year low. The IMF predicts losses at global financial institutions may reach $1.5 trillion, further freezing credit worldwide.
 
Meanwhile, there’s the widening U.S. budget deficit projected to exceed $1 trillion (7.5 percent of GDP), global trade imbalances made worse by an undervalued Chinese currency and the fear, anger and mistrust surrounding a U.S. financial system that has gone from supermodel to scapegoat faster than you can say Bernie Madoff.
 
So whatever potential remedies Obama's team cooks up in the weeks and months ahead, they won’t be curing our economic ills quickly or easily. Patience, then, is needed — from Wall Street, to Main Street and just about every other avenue, calle or hutong on the planet.
 
But so, too, is the right presidential touch. Obama must somehow find the perfect mix of chemistry, flexibility, ego management and practical policy measures that will not only help restore economic confidence here, but around the world.
 
Let's hope the new president can find his inner-Miles. If not, we're all likely to be kind of blue for a long, long time.

Comments:

4 Comments.

Login or Register to post comments

Posted by MartynStrong on January 12, 2009 16:22 ET

Capital markets are unstable. In the past there was no way to make them stable. But today we have computer power that can be used to make them stable. By using the greater computer power of today we can have a much higher turn over of capital in the capital market. This higher turnover will make the market harder to game or control and the market will no longer have the unstable run ups or declines. Who can change or control the market when say 20% of the capital is trading each day. So now that we have the compute power to provide for all these transactions that will smooth out the market how to we force people to turn over at a rate of 20% a day? Easy, put a cap gains tax of 0% (zero) on all gains of 7 days or less and put a cap gains tax of 90% of all gains of more than 7 days. The likes of Yahoo, Micosoft and/or Sun Micro Systems will give us the systems that will provide automated software agents to support turning over one's investments every 7 days (based on the specs you give the agent). A system like this will make the financial markets work as smoothly as the local fruit market.

Posted by Steve Jones on January 19, 2009 01:35 ET

A system like this will make the financial markets work as smoothly as the local fruit market.

Until someone pulls the plug, either accidentally or on purpose.

I'm reminded of the post-invasion Iraqi stock market. Some bright young lad was assigned to set up the new bourse, and insisted on bringing in the highest of high technology. The Iraqis who had operated the previous market told him, hey, really all we need are white boards and markers - we ran the old bourse with just those tools.

After many frustrating delays in setting up his network, the bright young lad returned from a furlough and found the market was up and running - with white boards and markers.

If something as complex as a worldwide capitalist system can be undone by a virus, a missed digit, a bomb in a server farm, or by Joe the Plumber dropping a soggy plunger into the power supply, I wouldn't call the system "stable."

But more importantly, encouraging day trading over investing is insane. That's not a capital market, it's a casino.

Posted by MartynStrong on February 2, 2009 18:28 ET

Markets have been using computers for some time now and there have been no problems caused by someone pulling the plug.

Posted by MartynStrong on February 2, 2009 18:35 ET

This system does not encourage day trading over investing - it makes day trading worthless. With the market moving like a strong river there day traders will have no price changes to live on. The same will be true for the hedge funds.

Recent on Commerce:

Teacher in a box: Outsourcing homework to India

Saritha Rai - India - November 20, 2009 16:28 ET

Need help with that term paper, young American? Meet Saswati Patnaik.

Back to the Azores: a brand-new world

Ken Shulman - Europe - November 20, 2009 10:25 ET

The reverse flow of migration to this small chain of Portuguese islands is a modern marvel.

Cuba tries to keep the lights on

Nick Miroff - Cuba - November 20, 2009 06:55 ET

Cuba gets plenty of oil from Venezuela. So why is it adopting "extreme measures" to avoid blackouts?

How can 39 million buffalo be wrong?

Jason Overdorf - India - November 19, 2009 06:30 ET

Indian farmers discover the beauty of mozzarella.

Analysis: Obama in China: It's about the money

Kathleen E. McLaughlin - China and its neighbors - November 18, 2009 10:57 ET

How, and why, Obama is treating the dragon differently.

Silicon Sweatshops: A promising model

Jonathan Adams and Kathleen E. McLaughlin - China and its neighbors - November 18, 2009 06:54 ET

There's no easy way to police supply chains in Asia. But one US high-tech firm and its Taiwan supplier are taking a creative approach that might just work.

Special report: Silicon Sweatshops

Jonathan Adams and Kathleen E. McLaughlin - China and its neighbors - November 17, 2009 15:05 ET

Despite strict "codes of conduct," labor rights violations are the norm at factories making the world's favorite high-tech gadgets.

What do you think about Silicon Sweatshops?

News Desk - China and its neighbors - November 17, 2009 15:04 ET

Are high-tech supply chains in Asia good business or exploitation? You decide.

Silicon Sweatshops: Shattered dreams

Jonathan Adams - China and its neighbors - November 17, 2009 07:24 ET

Migrant workers making gadgets at Taiwan's high-tech parks sign deals that make them modern-day indentured servants.

Silicon Sweatshops: The China connection

Kathleen E. McLaughlin and Jonathan Adams - China and its neighbors - November 17, 2009 07:22 ET

For migrant workers, an electronics factory job can be a ticket into China's booming middle class. But for many, it turns into a nightmare of poor working conditions and indifferent bosses.

Silicon Sweatshops: Disposable workforce

Jonathan Adams - China and its neighbors - November 17, 2009 07:22 ET

Laid-off Taiwanese workers accuse their firm of violating industry codes even when times were good.

Video: The Chinese on Obama

Josh Chin - China and its neighbors - November 16, 2009 19:16 ET

Japan’s downward spiral

Gavin Blair - Japan - November 16, 2009 18:17 ET

One in six Japanese are now poor. The new government has vowed to tackle the problem, but how?

Asia's pushback to big tobacco

Patrick Winn - Thailand - November 15, 2009 12:30 ET

The cigarette industry wants a bigger slice of Asia. Activists want them to butt out.

International visitors buoy US tourism industry

Susan E. Reed - Worldview - November 15, 2009 09:30 ET

Despite dreary economic times, a favorable exchange rate beckons foreign tourists to the majestic Grand Circle and beyond.

Obama in Japan: Reassuring an old friend

Justin McCurry in Tokyo - Japan - November 14, 2009 16:58 ET

America's first "pacific president" extends a hand. But it's not all smiles.

Obama in Beijing: What you will see. And won't see.

Kathleen E. McLaughlin - China and its neighbors - November 14, 2009 15:56 ET

In China, anything is possible. Nothing is easy.

How other US presidents handled the dragon

Kathleen E. McLaughlin - China and its neighbors - November 14, 2009 11:31 ET

From Nixon, to Ford, to Reagan, Clinton and both Bushes, dealing with China has never been simple.

On Location: Haryana — India's looming food crisis

Jason Overdorf - India - November 12, 2009 16:45 ET

Fat in Japan? You're breaking the law.

David Nakamura - Japan - November 11, 2009 08:40 ET

As the health care debate rages in the US, Tokyo lawmakers set a maximum waist size. Are you too fat for Japan?