American jazz musician Miles Davis during rehersals for an episode of "Robert Herridge Theater" titled "The Sound of Miles Davis" in New York City April 2, 1959. (CBS Photo Archive/Getty Images)

For Which It Stands: Commerce

Obama's economists are great, but can Barack channel Miles Davis?

By Thomas Mucha
Published: January 4, 2009 13:06 ET
Updated: January 30, 2009 19:06 ET

As Barack Obama is about to find out, all-star teams can be funny things. Fortunately, he has some history to guide him.
 
In the mid-1960s Miles Davis molded Wayne Shorter, Herbie Hancock, Ron Carter and Tony Williams — musical legends all — into one of the greatest quintets in jazz history. Their collective artistry was second only to Miles’ previous band, which used the same all-star approach to produce "A Kind of Blue," the best selling jazz record of all time and one I’ve heard played in Beijing, Bangalore, Cairo, London, rural Mexico and other far-flung places.
 
Basketball offers another hopeful lesson. In 1992, under the invisible hand of coach Chuck Daly the U.S. “Dream Team” seized the Olympic gold medal with an average winning margin of 43.8 points, and with Daly not once needing to call a timeout.
 
In both cases these effective leaders put together supremely talented teams. But then, critically, they made their stars align.
 
Click here to go to the For Which It Stands Complete Guide
 
Conjuring greatness, of course, is rare. And for every all-star triumph there’s disaster waiting to happen: think the Warren Beatty-Dustin Hoffman debacle "Ishtar," or more ominiously for Obama, Kennedy's coterie of the "best and brightest" who dreamed up that young president's Vietnam policy.
 
The dangers are everywhere: ego, pride, ambition, internecine feuds, miscommunication and mixed messages.
 
That brings us to our current predicament, the worst global economic crisis since the Great Depression.
 
Obama’s economic posse is a dream team by any measure. They’re the Keynesian equivalent of John Coltrane’s tenor or Charles Barkley’s elbow. These are talented, smart, and original thinkers.
 
There’s prickly Larry Summers in the White House, serene Timothy Geithner at Treasury (provided he survives the nomination process), stingy Peter Orszag overseeing the Congressional Budget Office and professorial Christina Romer heading up the Council of Economic Advisers. There’s also the respected Paul Volcker leading a new Economic Recovery Advisory Board under the daily direction of brainy University of Chicago economist and Obama confidante Austan Goolsbee.
 
But here’s the question: Can the incoming President — who is, happily, a fan of Miles Davis and who, conveniently, sports a wicked jump shot — make this stellar economic team perform its own feats of greatness?
 
So far, the signs are promising. And they do hint at the Miles mode of leadership, which expertly mixed a variety of talents and voices.
 
President-elect Obama has clearly gone for smarts, competence, and a global outlook. But most importantly, he’s picked advisers with the right experience.
 
While working at Treasury in the late 1990s, Summers and Geithner helped manage several similar global economic problems, including the Asian financial crisis, Russia's bond default and Mexico's devaluation of the peso. Geithner’s globalist street cred is especially strong: he's studied Japanese and Chinese and has lived in Japan, China, Thailand, India and Zimbabwe.
 
These economists also both know how to get bureaucratic wheels moving, and how to work with other countries — ideal skills for the current global crisis.
 
Romer, meanwhile, is known for her academic expertise of the Great Depression — scary, but useful knowledge in today’s White House.
 
And as a former Federal Reserve Chairman under presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan, Volcker is hard-wired to resist the political pressure and pork that can lead to bad economic policy.
 
Accordingly, Obama’s team is winning near-universal praise. “The most important issue is that they know how to make government work,” University of Chicago international political economist Marvin Zonis and a colleague of Goolsbee, told me. “They know how to deal with what is a global financial and economic crisis.”
 
They had better. The speed and severity of this crisis, which began in the United States and is spreading around the world should scare anyone, all-star or not.
 
The U.S. economy — which produces 25 percent of global output — is expected to shrink for at least three straight quarters, a feat not seen in a half-century. Unemployment is already at a 16-year high. Consumer confidence has fallen to a 40-year low. The IMF predicts losses at global financial institutions may reach $1.5 trillion, further freezing credit worldwide.
 
Meanwhile, there’s the widening U.S. budget deficit projected to exceed $1 trillion (7.5 percent of GDP), global trade imbalances made worse by an undervalued Chinese currency and the fear, anger and mistrust surrounding a U.S. financial system that has gone from supermodel to scapegoat faster than you can say Bernie Madoff.
 
So whatever potential remedies Obama's team cooks up in the weeks and months ahead, they won’t be curing our economic ills quickly or easily. Patience, then, is needed — from Wall Street, to Main Street and just about every other avenue, calle or hutong on the planet.
 
But so, too, is the right presidential touch. Obama must somehow find the perfect mix of chemistry, flexibility, ego management and practical policy measures that will not only help restore economic confidence here, but around the world.
 
Let's hope the new president can find his inner-Miles. If not, we're all likely to be kind of blue for a long, long time.

Comments:

4 Comments.

Login or Register to post comments

Posted by MartynStrong on January 12, 2009 16:22 ET

Capital markets are unstable. In the past there was no way to make them stable. But today we have computer power that can be used to make them stable. By using the greater computer power of today we can have a much higher turn over of capital in the capital market. This higher turnover will make the market harder to game or control and the market will no longer have the unstable run ups or declines. Who can change or control the market when say 20% of the capital is trading each day. So now that we have the compute power to provide for all these transactions that will smooth out the market how to we force people to turn over at a rate of 20% a day? Easy, put a cap gains tax of 0% (zero) on all gains of 7 days or less and put a cap gains tax of 90% of all gains of more than 7 days. The likes of Yahoo, Micosoft and/or Sun Micro Systems will give us the systems that will provide automated software agents to support turning over one's investments every 7 days (based on the specs you give the agent). A system like this will make the financial markets work as smoothly as the local fruit market.

Posted by Steve Jones on January 19, 2009 01:35 ET

A system like this will make the financial markets work as smoothly as the local fruit market.

Until someone pulls the plug, either accidentally or on purpose.

I'm reminded of the post-invasion Iraqi stock market. Some bright young lad was assigned to set up the new bourse, and insisted on bringing in the highest of high technology. The Iraqis who had operated the previous market told him, hey, really all we need are white boards and markers - we ran the old bourse with just those tools.

After many frustrating delays in setting up his network, the bright young lad returned from a furlough and found the market was up and running - with white boards and markers.

If something as complex as a worldwide capitalist system can be undone by a virus, a missed digit, a bomb in a server farm, or by Joe the Plumber dropping a soggy plunger into the power supply, I wouldn't call the system "stable."

But more importantly, encouraging day trading over investing is insane. That's not a capital market, it's a casino.

Posted by MartynStrong on February 2, 2009 18:28 ET

Markets have been using computers for some time now and there have been no problems caused by someone pulling the plug.

Posted by MartynStrong on February 2, 2009 18:35 ET

This system does not encourage day trading over investing - it makes day trading worthless. With the market moving like a strong river there day traders will have no price changes to live on. The same will be true for the hedge funds.

Recent on Commerce:

Gay sex on film? No problem. Baring political rifts? Problem.

Patrick Winn - Thailand - November 7, 2009 11:27 ET

Live and let live in Thailand. Except when one gay man is Buddhist, and the other is Muslim.

China and Costa Rica move toward free trade agreement

Alex Leff - Costa Rica - November 7, 2009 11:01 ET

China wants ties in the region, Costa Rica wants Chinese goods. But not everyone's pleased.

Indonesia: Corruption junction

Peter Gelling - Indonesia - November 6, 2009 14:02 ET

A corruption scandal hits — you guessed it — the country's anti-corruption commission.

Easter Island: even more difficult to get to?

Pascale Bonnefoy - Chile - November 6, 2009 06:42 ET

Indigenous population considers limiting visitors and immigrants to one of Chile's top tourist destinations.

Design within reach

Daniel Grushkin - NGOs - November 5, 2009 17:36 ET

Cameron Sinclair founded Architecture for Humanity to bring thoughtful design to the world’s neediest.

The asses of New Delhi

Jason Overdorf - India - November 5, 2009 05:41 ET

With a year to go before hosting the Commonwealth Games, Delhi targets the poor. Its donkeys, too.

On Location: Haryana — India's looming food crisis

Jason Overdorf - India - November 2, 2009 17:30 ET

Tweeting from Fugitiveland

Patrick Winn - Thailand - November 2, 2009 06:35 ET

Thailand's ex-premier is on the run. And he wants the Twitterati to know about it.

In Taiwan, pro baseball is all mobbed up

Jonathan Adams - China and its neighbors - November 1, 2009 10:27 ET

For some professional players, losing is an offer they can't refuse.

The world's biggest problem: Our hungry planet

Thomas Mucha - Commerce - October 31, 2009 08:42 ET

Global hunger just got worse. What can the dismal science do?

In India, C-sections are in the stars

Mridu Khullar - India - October 31, 2009 06:00 ET

When's that baby due? The astrologer knows.

Shackleton's whisky, lost then found

Emily Stone - Commerce - October 30, 2009 18:33 ET

Explorer Ernest Shackleton loved his Scotch whisky and he left a stash at the bottom of the world.

Whisky on (Antarctic) ice

Emily Stone - Global Green - October 30, 2009 18:28 ET

Explorer Ernest Shackleton loved his Scotch whisky. And he left a stash at the bottom of the world.

Exploiting the motion of the ocean

Colin Woodard - Canada - October 30, 2009 09:35 ET

Energy companies are trying to turn eastern Canada's coast into the Saudi Arabia of tidal power. Critics fear for the fisheries.

Interview: India's Foreign Minister S.M. Krishna

Saritha Rai - India - October 29, 2009 15:37 ET

What does a rising power think about China, Obama, the Taliban, Pakistan, Afghanistan and more?

Child sex boom fueled by poverty

Deena Guzder - Thailand - October 29, 2009 11:24 ET

It's just another dark day in Thailand.

Debating the daddy state

Nick Miroff - Cuba - October 27, 2009 05:54 ET

As the economy slides, Cubans have been asked to rethink socialism.

Whose line is it, anyway?

Laura Fitch - China and its neighbors - October 26, 2009 05:46 ET

What's the best way to cope with the migrant life in China? Improv theater, of course.

Argentina's Slaughterhouse Blues

Charles Newbery - Argentina - October 25, 2009 11:13 ET

In the name of domestic politics, President Kirchner is alienating investors and squandering her country's reputation for premium beef.

British politics: The cookie crumbles

Barry Neild - United Kingdom - October 25, 2009 11:08 ET

Will the U.K. government finally fall over thanks to Biscuitgate?