Connect to share and comment
Analysis: Low expectations for APEC, but summit allows leaders to address bilateral disputes.
TOKYO, Japan — As a demonstration of a commitment to free trade, it falls some way short of the dramatic arrival of Commodore Perry’s black ships in Yokohama 150 years ago, which forced Japan to open up to a world it had shunned for two centuries.
It is fitting, though, that world leaders will attend the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum (APEC) in the same city this weekend — perhaps a little bruised by a testy G20 meeting in South Korea that culminated Friday in little more than putting off the heavy lifting of decision-making — to finalize an agreement that shuns protectionism and identifies free trade as a solution to the region’s economic imbalances.
The groundwork has already been done by finance and foreign ministers from APEC, a 21-nation body that includes the world’s three biggest economies: the United States, China and Japan.
Earlier this week they agreed to extend a freeze on any new protectionist measures for another three years, and called for a conclusion to the bedevilled Doha round of free trade talks by the end of next year. "While the world economy is on its way to recovery … there remains a possibility of increasing protectionist pressures in the future," their statement said.
Encompassing 40 percent of the globe’s population and 44 percent of its trade, the Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific (FTAAP) up for discussion in Yokohama would be the world’s biggest.
It also may never see the light of day, at least in the form envisioned by APEC’s upbeat ministerial communique this week.
The body does not have the legal authority to implement the agreement, and some have labeled the zone as unworkable, given the diverse size and nature of the economies it is expected to bring together.
In Japan, where angst is rising over the progress its neighbor, South Korea, is making in inking free trade deals, the government must contend with opposition from farmers, concerned about the potential for cheap imports to put them out of business.
While Japan has decided to spare its guests the embarrassment of donning traditional attire — they will line up for the obligatory photo shoot in “smart casual” mode — this weekend’s talks could present more serious problems than sartorial discomfort.
Given APEC’s lack of policymaking powers, observers will be looking for more nuanced signs that the U.S. president, Barack Obama, and other major leaders, have the appetite for the kind of concerted action needed to sustain the region’s slow economic recovery.
The G20 talks set an uncomfortable precedent: the United States faced a backlash over its second dalliance with quantitative easing to boost demand at home. China, under pressure to devalue its currency, spoke for many in the region when it warned that the U.S. Federal Reserve’s new spending program could create asset bubbles in emerging economies such as Thailand and Indonesia.
But officials have played down the potential for a prolonged spat over exchange rates. "I don't believe there is going to be a currency war," Robert Zoellick, president of the World Bank, said. "There are tensions in the exchange [market] and these tensions risk an increase in protectionism.”