Editor's note

Relating to GlobalPost's coverage of the UN report on conflict minerals in the DRC.
News Desk
Gold miners form a human chain while digging an open pit at the Chudja mine in the Kilomoto concession near the village of Kobu, 62 miles from Bunia in northeastern Congo, Feb. 23, 2009. Civil conflict in Congo has been driven for more than a decade by the violent struggle for control over the country's vast natural resources, including gold, diamonds and timber, most of which is exploited using hard manual labor. (Finbarr O'Reilly/Reuters) Click to enlarge photo

A GlobalPost story published Dec. 3 about a United Nations report on the export of minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo contained inaccuracies. The U.N. report does not, as the headline and several paragraphs of the story stated, name the American company Niotan Inc. as a direct buyer of conflict minerals from Congo. That story has been removed from the GlobalPost website.

The U.N. report mentions the Nevada-based Niotan Inc. in connection to John Crawley, who is a director of the company. Crawley, the report says, is also a director of the Hong Kong-based Refractory Metals Mining Company Ltd. (RMMC), which was formerly called Niotan Ltd. On the same street in Hong Kong is another company, African Ventures Ltd. (AVL), which the report says was set up by Crawley's father. The section of the report on the mineral cassiterite mentions John Crawley and the network of companies under the subtitle "exports to international markets."

The U.N. report traces minerals from mines in the Congo to "internal buying networks," and to export companies that sell the minerals to companies abroad, including AVL.

The GlobalPost report of Dec. 3 also relied on an investigation by the Washington-based Enough Project, headed by John Prendergast. Enough is the anti-genocide project at the Center for American Progress. Their research, including shipping records, “suggests” that Niotan, Inc. is “currently supplying the U.S. electronics industry with tantalum from rebel-held mines in eastern Congo,” according to a press release issued by Enough.

In an interview with GlobalPost, Crawley said he had contacted Enough directly and disputed their research, saying it was not substantiated by facts.

Crawley also said he felt the United Nations’ report cast his company in an unfair light although he was careful to say he felt its author had “his heart in the right place.”

“If you carefully read the report, it implies all kinds of things are wrong. But it does so in the face of careful documentation that proves otherwise,” said Crawley.

Crawley added that he has worked for many years to improve transparency and accountability in the industry.

“I have tried to push the industry to reform and not ignore what is going on,” he added.

 

Post new comment

CAPTCHA
Please type the two wavy words in the box below, then click "submit."

It wouldn't make any

It wouldn't make any difference if the US company stopped trading in Congolese minerals today. China would pick up the slack.

So just because China has a

So just because China has a horrific human rights record and would pick up the slack, we should do as they do?? Very weak argument. How about this, it wouldn't make one bit of a difference if you yourself stopped raping children in your neighborhood, because someone else would. How does that sound now??

A more than sufficient reason

A more than sufficient reason to keep on exploiting people and fueling wars, I imagine...

It's a large step, but

It's a large step, but someone has to take it. Enough! Or there will never be peace on the planet. If some greedy minds put this together, some non-exploitative minds can tear it down. Step out of your fear and think!!! Plan!!! and Act!!!

it will be nice for the

it will be nice for the united nations, to stop foreign companies from aiding and abetting destruction in africa.

Dispatches: Diplomacy

GlobalBlogs: Diplomacy