Haiti: Help with money, not stuff

After every major disaster, misguided donations actually worsen the suffering.
David Case
A injured child receives medical treatment on Jan. 13, 2010 after an earthquake had devastated Port-au-Prince the day before. The 7.0 magnitude quake rocked Haiti, killing possibly thousands of people as it toppled the presidential palace and hillside shanties alike and leaving the poor Caribbean nation appealing for international help. (Eduardo Munoz/Reuters) Click to enlarge photo

BOSTON — The images emerging from Haiti’s massive earthquake are gut-wrenching. As usual in such disasters, Americans are responding generously. Millions of dollars will be raised.

If you’re considering doing your part, that’s great. But, experts say, whatever you do, don’t donate anything but money. Under no circumstances should you mail care packages, toys, food or clothes. Don’t even think about sending drugs. The response to prior disasters shows that regardless of your intentions, you will only be making matters worse.

That’s what happened in the aftermath of the December 2004 tsunami. The disaster was followed by an unprecedented outpouring of global generosity. This dramatically facilitated the grisly chore of cleaning up the tens of thousands of bodies left under the tropical sun, and it funded a reconstruction effort that, while far from perfect, provided roofs over the heads of many.

But aid workers joked that the real tsunami was followed by another tsunami — of misguided goodwill. In an effort to help, people shipped boxes, often following the instructions of local television news programs. And so in Aceh, Indonesia amid the trauma, hunger and devastation, care packages piled up containing everything from pajamas and teddy bears to birth control pills and Bibles — a hodgepodge impossible to sort through. There were boxes filled with half-used ointments and prescription drugs, as if do-gooders had cleaned out their medicine cabinets. And some unscrupulous corporations — exploiting tax write-offs for soon-to-be-expired pharmaceuticals — apparently shipped whatever had been lying around the warehouse for too long.

Boxes of supplies sent after the 2004 tsunami.
(Courtesy Pharmaciens Sans Frontiers)

It all amounted to a mountain of materials that confounded the efforts of the pros, and made it more difficult to deliver essential supplies on the earthquake-ravaged roads.

Months after the aftershocks stopped, the French aid organization Pharmaciens Sans Frontieres (Pharmacists Without Borders) conducted a study of that second tsunami. In a world where most people lack adequate access to medicine, the results were a travesty.

The group found that although officials didn’t request any medicine, they received 4,000 metric tons of it, or more than 4 pounds for each person in the tsunami-affected area. There were multiple-year supplies of antibiotics, and palette loads of drugs unknown to health care providers. Seventy percent of it was labeled in a language that locals did not understand.

Disasters like the Haiti earthquake and the Indian Ocean tsunami present colossal logistical challenges. Nonetheless, in Aceh officials and relief workers did their best to sort through this stock: Drugs were stored in private homes, in hospitals rooms and corridors (despite a desperate shortage of space for patients). Eighty-four percent of the facilities lacked air conditioning, rendering their contents unusable, according to the study. A large depot near Aceh’s airport was so overwhelmed that mountains of pricey pharmaceuticals were dumped outside to rot under the monsoons and tropical sun.

Of course, the donors were only trying to help, but misplaced intentions actually worsened the suffering. Buried under care packages and out of date antibiotics labeled in Thai and Chinese were the world’s most advanced malaria medications. Meanwhile along the coast, people who had just lost homes and families writhed in malarial fever for lack of treatment.

In the end, most of the drugs had to be incinerated — you can’t simply send such a stock to the dump, where it would seep into the ground water and create another health hazard. That cost donors and the Indonesian government millions.

Aceh was by no means unusual in this regard. Massive shipments of useless medicine arrived on the scenes of other heavily televised disasters, such as the Armenian earthquake in 1988 and the Albanian exodus from Kosovo in the late 1990s. After the war ended in Bosnia, 17,000 tons of inappropriate donations had to be burned, according to Pharmaciens Sans Frontieres. Aid workers struggling to ease suffering after Hurricane Mitch reportedly worked late into the night sorting through half-used tubes of Preparation H and opened bottles of Prozac.

Such harmful donations will almost certainly flood Haiti as well in the coming days. But if you want to help, send money to a reputable aid group instead.

Editor's note: This story was updated to correct a figure concerning the amount of aid distributed to Aceh victims of the December 2004 tsunami. Officials received more than 4 pounds for each person in the tsunami-affected area, rather than 8 pounds for each person in the province as previously stated. The story was later updated to clarify the photo caption.

Post new comment

CAPTCHA
Please type the two wavy words in the box below, then click "submit."

Unfortunately, the corruption

Unfortunately, the corruption runs so deeply among the government officials and the police in Haiti that "sending money" may help everyone but the poor. As correctly pointed out by Bill O'Reilly on his program last night, the U.S. has sent more than 1 million dollars to Haiti over the last decade. As you look at the pictures of Port Au Prince, is there any obvious evidence of this aid? Try the bank accounts of the state officials.

Sending "stuff" leads to chaos. Sending money leads to theft. Hard to say what the answer is here.

Dr. David Secord

There are over 9 million

There are over 9 million people in Haiti.

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ha.html

Even $200 million annually is only a little over $20 a person.

http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Global-News/2010/0113/Haiti-earthquake-da...

What are you expecting to see for that money? Much less the crazily inaccurate number of $1 million over a decade?

Donate to MSF/Doctors without Borders if you want the money to go to a credible and helpful location. Educate yourself about the real issues happening there.

Sending money to reputable and credible aid organizations helps considerably.

I think perhaps you meant to

I think perhaps you meant to say 1 billion? 1 Million dollars wouldn't make a dent in any nations development efforts. While it's true that the Haitian government is reportedly quite corrupt, I doubt the money donated to humanitarian aid in Haiti will go to the government, but rather it will be spent by those humanitarian organisations to bring in and deploy supplies. It's not as if the money being donated is just being shipped over in giant crates to be hoarded by corrupt officials.

From what i've seen so far in this crisis, the Haitian government has had absolutely no say in how the funds/materials are being used - which is probably for the best, considering the state of disarray the government finds itself in.

The reconstruction effort is, however, a different story. It will require the coordination of local and foreign parties and may allow local officials to take advantage of the situation.

Did you really mean 1

Did you really mean 1 million, over a decade? That wouldn't build much. Maybe you mis-quoted Mr. O'Reilly.

Dr Secord, We respectfully

Dr Secord,

We respectfully disagree with your assertion that we shouldn't help with donations. Although the Haitian government has corruption problems, American organizations like Red Cross and Episcopal Relief and Development (which our school is donating to) will make sure the money gets to the desperate people who need it. It would be a shame not to help victims of such devastation.

Sincerely, an 8th grade class.

While I understand your

While I understand your concern that the money will only get lost in the corruption, I think you misunderstand the call and the need for funds. In order to help, you need to provide money and donations to the international relief organizations that are prepped and delivering the needed logistics and emergency relief on the ground. This is their job, this is what they do. They are trained for search and rescue, emergency medical treatment, housing, and food relief- and that is exactly what the people of Haiti need right now. Send money to the Red Cross, Partners in Health, Doctors Without Borders, World Vision, Mercy Corps - whichever nonprofit you feel is delivering what is needed. The call for money is not to invest in Haiti's government but to provide help to the agencies that are doing precisely what Haiti cannot. We absolutely can help, and we need to help. There is no excuse not to.

Dr. David Secord, you are

Dr. David Secord, you are absolutely correct. Look at what happened with the tsunami in 2004. 36% of the funds sent over were accounted for, the rest ended up in someones pockets. so sad. But what do you expect from a third world country? that is all they understand, even in a time of disaster and loss.

basspro79

Hey David I totally agree, I

Hey David

I totally agree, I even hear the red cross over their is not doing much
to help the real needy people, and it makes me angry that corruption
can bear its ugly head like this in such desperate times.

I'm sorry, at what point in

I'm sorry, at what point in this story do you mention the need to burn teddy bears and much needed clothing? Batteries and most supplies do not need to be labelled in the local language to be understood. Yes, perhaps the drugs are not a good idea for relief packages, but sending money to the most impoverished and corrupt country on the planet is clearly not an option. Why not run a story telling people not to send opened tubes of preparation-H instead of asking people with big hearts to send money and appearing shallow and corrupt. Most people cannot afford to help strangers in these hard financial times, but all have leftover clothes and toys to share. When you send money to a country with no infrastructure and no coordiantion between relief agencies you only delay much needed relief. They are burning bodies in the streets to protest the lack of supplies and the slow pace of getting those supplies out - why delay the process further by sending money that must then be resent out for needed supplies? Why not send unopened cases of water and bandages and clothes? Remember the rampant financial fraud after hurricane Katrina in New Orleans, LA? Do you really want a repeat of the same kind, but on an even larger scale?

The day you can eat a teddy

The day you can eat a teddy bear is the day you should send them to disaster-ravaged areas.

Donating money to Doctors Without Borders (for example) is hardly the same thing as sending the money to the Haitian government.

It's too bad that people

It's too bad that people can't trust the Haitian government to actually transfer all of the money to those who need it. I'll have to agree that donating the money to Doctors Without Borders is a much better option. I wouldn't blame the government because it's pretty common for a poor country to have corrupt politicians, but it shouldn't deter people from helping.

By the way, I feel sorry for all the people who got hurt and especially for this injured child in the picture, I wonder if he's fine now since it's been some time since the photo was taken.

Don't you get it,

Don't you get it, Shagatronic? Sending stuff just means it piles up on the docks and next to the airstrips, where sending money means you can actually hire a truck and put gas in it to TAKE stuff where it might do some good. Not EVERY relief organization is corrupt -- to imply that is foolish and irresponsible, "Doctor."

I personally would not donate

I personally would not donate anything to Haiti but donate to other charities instead. With ppl's attention to a major disaster there would usually be a problem of donation shortage for other unrelated charities in the coming months. Of course I am impressed by the kindness of Haiti donators, and hope I could have more $$ to help.

Although Mr. Secord is right

Although Mr. Secord is right that there is a lot of corruption in Haiti, concentrating your donated funds through a reputable charity (like Doctors Without Borders) is the best way to help. And as global citizens, we can't allow our cynicism to stopper an outpouring of humanitarianism- it is crucial that we help in any way that we can, fear of corruption or no.

Nonsense, most of the money

Nonsense, most of the money will be stolen as usual!
God bless America!

I have read your article for

I have read your article for a several times and I was impressed by it! It was very interesting so I shared it with my friends. Hope they will like it too.

I have a bunch of medical

I have a bunch of medical supplies that I want to donate. Is there still a need for such items in Haiti? I would love to help!

Dr.David you are right.I

Dr.David you are right.I think every one remembered what had happened at the time of tsunami.Most of the funds did't reached the sufferers .Under developed countries have more corruption.

Dispatches: The Americas

GlobalBlogs: The Americas

  • “Yesterday, Yelp ran its first daily deal in San Fancisco, and it killed. Yelp’s first deal was for a massage in San Francisco, which are...
    Eyes on Brazil | GlobalBlogger
  • Fast Food News Burgers and beer — an American meal if there ever was one — could soon have a distinctly Brazilian flavor. Burger King Holdings is in...
    Eyes on Brazil | GlobalBlogger
  • We´re in our PJs, the two of us, at 7:30 p.m., and we´re standing in the upstairs terraza, admiring the view at near dusk. It´s a view we´ve seen a...
    The Zapata Tales | GlobalBlogger
  • Sometimes I think I may end up in academia, since I'm happiest when I'm in school and I would love to be a professor. Plus, sometimes...
    Adventures of a... | GlobalBlogger
  • This news is a bit old (from 2007) but still interesting. “Brazilian and US scientists are looking into using spider venom as a possible...
    Eyes on Brazil | GlobalBlogger