U.S. troops in Diyala relax just after June 30 withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraqi cities. While U.S. forces will no longer operate in urban areas, their commanders say they will continue to remain active. (Tom A. Peter/GlobalPost)

Too many warriors, too little war

DiggThis

US forces can no longer patrol cities. So what will the 130,000 troops be doing?

By Tom A. Peter — GlobalPost
Published: July 4, 2009 08:30 ET

BAQUBA — The exit of American forces from Iraqi cities on Tuesday brought the six-year conflict closer to an end. But with the United States planning to maintain the same troop strength in Iraq into at least the beginning of next year, many are wondering what exactly all those troops will do.

The agreement has officially shifted U.S. forces, which number about 130,000, to an "advise and assist" mission. Combat forces will now focus their time on training Iraqi counterparts and carrying out reconstruction projects, in addition to joint patrols in rural areas.

U.S. forces will have to adjust to their limited access to cities, a more collaborative role with Iraqi forces and more advisory-focused missions instead of combat — changes they acknowledge may require some patience.

Many units began adopting the new regulations a few weeks ago to be better prepared for the official shift. The challenges they have faced offer a clue to what the rest of the forces will now deal with.

The adjustment period has proven frustrating at times, said U.S. Army Capt. John Atwell, commander of Black Heart Company, 2-8 Field Artillery battalion.

When his platoons arrived at Iraqi bases to conduct joint operations, Iraqi leaders often told them that they had nothing planned. While U.S. forces prefer to patrol, Iraqi forces often rely more on manning static checkpoints.

“I’ve got to get out there and get things done, but it’s difficult because I’ve got to go through them and they’re unreceptive,” said Captain Atwell, who thinks this is a step in the right direction despite the hurdles. “It’s a change of mindset from coalition forces leading the Iraqi security forces in the counterinsurgency fight to Iraqi security forces leading the counterinsurgency fight.”

U.S. forces can no longer enter cities unless they are invited by Iraqi authorities and have an Iraqi escort. In rural areas, most patrols will be joint American-Iraqi missions.

In the past, U.S. forces used to arrive at an Iraqi military base, collect local soldiers and conduct a U.S.-planned mission. Now Iraqi forces are deciding on mission objectives.

This leaves U.S. forces to work around Iraqi constraints. Many Iraqi security forces, for example, have a limited budget and cannot afford much fuel. If a U.S. unit wants to enter a city for a non-emergency reason, such as a meeting with a local official, the Iraqi military or police may refuse the escort request because of a lack of fuel. U.S. commanders are trying to work around this by potentially providing fuel to the Iraqis, but they are still working out the logistics.

Comments:

No Comments.

Login or Register to post comments

Recent on Iraq:

Britain anticipates Tony Blair's Iraq testimony

Matthew Hart - United Kingdom - January 26, 2010 06:59 ET

London police brace for protests as former Blair allies appear before the Chilcot commission prior to the ex-prime minister's Friday testimony.

In northern Iraq, another world

Stephen Kurczy - Iraq - December 12, 2009 09:47 ET

A long way from Baghdad

Claire Duffett - Iraq - December 12, 2009 09:46 ET

Kurdistan is not Iraq, its citizens say again and again.

Opinion: Obama defines the use of war in an age of terror

C.M. Sennott - Worldview - December 10, 2009 11:43 ET

Obama's Nobel acceptance speech was a self-effacing and deeply personal exploration of "just war."

Four bombings rock Baghdad

Jane Arraf - Iraq - December 8, 2009 14:37 ET

Attacks paralyze government buildings ahead of crucial elections.

Iraqi election deal sealed at 11th hour

Jane Arraf - Iraq - December 7, 2009 15:39 ET

Analysis: Lawmakers on Sunday ended months of wrangling over an election law. Now for the hard part.

Analysis: Passing of Iraq election law brings relief

Jane Arraf - Iraq - November 23, 2009 12:52 ET

U.S. officials made unwanted compromises, but can now turn their attention toward troop withdrawal.

Discord as elections loom in Iraq

Jane Arraf - Worldview - October 20, 2009 08:40 ET

Analysis: The country struggles to decide just how democratic it really wants to be.

Iraq's election issues

Jane Arraf - Iraq - October 20, 2009 08:28 ET

Graft the next great hurdle to a 'new' Iraq

Tom A. Peter - Iraq - October 16, 2009 15:43 ET

Worse than the Saddam years? On the topic of corruption, many Iraqis say yes.

Opinion: Isolating insurgents is nothing new

HDS Greenway - Worldview - October 6, 2009 05:42 ET

In the Vietnam era it was called pacification. Today it’s nation-building.

US plays peace broker in Iraq

Tom A. Peter - Iraq - September 25, 2009 10:34 ET

As tensions between Arabs and Kurds grow, and US troops prepare to leave, the race is on to broker a lasting peace.

Behind Baghdad's '9/11'

Jane Arraf - Iraq - September 16, 2009 14:43 ET

Regret, rage and recrimination follow last week's deadly attacks.

Opinion: Slouching toward Baghdad

Joel Brinkley - Worldview - September 6, 2009 08:23 ET

The challenges of building a new democracy in a place that has been resistant to it.

Iraq: In the bunker

Jane Arraf - Iraq - August 20, 2009 08:07 ET

A wave of bombs, a dark anniversary, and a war that won't go away.

A summer of protest. Is anyone listening?

Teri Schultz - European Union - August 15, 2009 11:24 ET

An Iranian exile worries his demonstrations against Iraq fall on deaf ears.

The waiting game

Tom A. Peter - Iraq - August 13, 2009 08:39 ET

Traveling with the US military in Iraq? Best pack a good book.

Meet the economic gangsters

Mark Scheffler - Commerce - August 12, 2009 09:03 ET

Economic gangsters come in all shapes and sizes — they're Asian dictators and Somali pirates.

Your foxhole or mine?

Tom A. Peter - Iraq - August 8, 2009 11:38 ET

For married military couples, being deployed together has its advantages and drawbacks.