Connect to share and comment
The US added a paltry 74,000 jobs in December, in a slowdown in employment creation that put pause to hopes that the economy has moved into higher gear.
The Labor Department data released Friday was far below the 197,000 jobs economists had expected, and less than half the monthly average of the past 12 months.
Some analysts said a spate of harsh weather in parts of the country likely depressed hiring -- construction jobs fell, for example, despite the rebound in the housing industry -- and that it followed strong jobs growth the previous two months.
Yet others said the data was a signal for caution going ahead, especially given the economic weakness elsewhere around the world.
The unemployment rate fell sharply from 7.0 percent to 6.7 percent, the lowest level since October 2008.
But that normally good news was largely explained by nearly 350,000 people dropping out of the workforce, rather than getting jobs.
"Clearly this latest news raises some uncertainty" about economic growth, said Paul Edelstein at IHS Global Insight.
The news sparked questions over the Federal Reserve's just-launched program of cutting back its stimulus, with markets taking it as a sign the Fed could slow its timeline for monetary tightening.
Wall Street stocks ended slightly higher, with the S&P 500 adding 0.23 percent.
The US 10-year bond yield fell sharply to 2.86 percent from 2.96 percent Thursday, while the dollar lost about 0.4 percent against the euro, which rose to $1.3663 in late-afternoon trade.
"Ultimately, the uncertainty surrounding the jobs market raises the possibility that the Fed might forego another taper move at its next meeting later this month," Edelstein said.
"Instead, the Fed might choose to wait for another data point on the jobs market to see if December was an aberration."
The numbers added to the fight in Congress over whether the government needs to spend more to create jobs and support the jobless.
On Thursday Senate Democrats proposed legislation to restore long-term jobless benefits to people who lost them at the end of the year.
Jason Furman, the chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisors, said the numbers are a reminder of the challenge especially of dealing with long-term unemployment.
"Despite an abundance of evidence indicating that this challenge is far from solved, Congress allowed extended unemployment insurance to lapse at the end of 2013, cutting off a critical lifeline to those who lost a job through no fault of their own and are still searching for work," he said in a statement.
"While we are making progress, extended unemployment insurance benefits remain necessary and should be the first order of business in 2014."
But John Boehner, Speaker of the House of Representatives, countered that the data shows that President Barack Obama's policies "are failing too many Americans, many of whom have simply stopped looking for work."
Surprised by both the job creation and unemployment rate figures, many analysts said they were deceiving and that updates and revisions over the next few months were likely to show a better picture.
Seemingly contradictory, the two key figures come from different surveys -- jobs growth from business and official establishments and the jobless rate from household data, explaining some of the discrepancy.
In the establishment data, private firms generated a net 87,000 jobs last month, largely in the retail trade and temporary jobs, with a drop in construction jobs paralleling bad weather in many parts of the country.
Meanwhile government jobs at all levels fell a net 13,000.
And at the same time, the numbers for average weekly wages and hours worked generally softened
The household survey showed a larger rise in new employment, but the main change was the fall in the size of the labor force.
"The drop was almost entirely due to people leaving the labor force as the number of people reported employed in December only rose by 143,000, just enough to keep the employment-to-population ratio constant," said economist Dean Baker of the Center for Economic and Policy Research.
The same data showed a fall in the labor force participation rate, to an extremely low 62.8 percent, far below the 66 percent-plus levels seen before the 2008 financial crisis.
Ian Shepherdson of Pantheon Macroeconomics cautioned not to put too much weight on the numbers for one month, which he said could eventually be sharply revised.
"The payroll numbers are the wildest of wild cards in recent memory and make no sense in the context of all the other labor market data," he said in a client note.
"Weather effects may account for some or even all the shortfall," he added.