Connect to share and comment

A war on terror where the rules don’t apply

Analysis: The United States may have to abandon the moral high ground following embarrassing revelations about drone attacks and its treatment of terror suspects — even against its own citizens.

the Obama administration is more forthcoming than it has been, the president's nominee for CIA director could face an uphill battle.

John Brennan has been an outspoken advocate of the CIA’s drone program, and as the White House counterterroism adviser was actually in charge of crafting the "kill list."

Brennan will doubtless undergo rigorous questioning on the targeted killings of US citizens when he faces the Senate Thursday.

The white paper has been termed “chilling” by the American Civil Liberties Union.

“Some of the white paper's key legal arguments don't stand up to even cursory review,” wrote Jameel Jaffer, the ACLU’s deputy legal director, in a blog posted on the group’s website.

“According to the white paper, the government has the authority to carry out targeted killings of US citizens without presenting evidence to a judge before the fact or after, and indeed without even acknowledging to the courts or to the public that the authority has been exercised. Without saying so explicitly, the government claims the authority to kill American terrorism suspects in secret.”

That lack of accountability is something the Open Society Foundation (OSF) laments in its report “Globalizing Torture: CIA Secret Detention and Extraordinary Rendition,” released Tuesday.

OSF is an international organization begun by businessman and philanthropist George Soros to promote democratic governance, human rights and social reform.

In its report, the OSF discloses details of an extensive program of extra-legal detention and transfer of terror suspects to countries where there was a clear possibility that they would be tortured.

In this effort, which, as the report alleges, was a gross violation of the UN Convention Against Torture, the United States was aided by a staggering 54 countries, from Europe to Asia to Africa to North America.

“By engaging in torture and other abuses associated with secret detention and extraordinary rendition, the US government violated domestic and international law, thereby diminishing its moral standing and eroding support for its counterterrorism efforts worldwide as these abuses came to light,” reads the report’s executive summary.

Extraordinary rendition — in which terror suspects are secretly detained and transferred to third-party nations for interrogation — is closely associated with the administration of President George W. Bush, which instituted the practice in the immediate wake of 9/11. In the intense climate following the attack on the World Trade Center, normal rules simply ceased to apply.

“There was ‘before’ 9/11 and ‘after’ 9/11,” said Cofer Black, who was director of the CIA’s Counterterrorism Center on Sept. 11, 2001, quoted in the OSF report. “After 9/11 the gloves come off.”

The US embraced “enhanced interrogation techniques” which, as explained by then Assistant Attorney General Jay Bybee, did not amount to torture.

“In a memorandum dated August 1, 2002, then Assistant Attorney General Jay Bybee opined that physical abuse would not amount to torture unless it inflicted pain of a level associated with organ failure, impairment of bodily function, or even death,” writes OSF.

But even torture could be justified, US anti-torture statutes not withstanding, wrote Bybee, in what became known as his “torture memo.”

Restrictions on interrogation techniques would “represent an unconstitutional infringement of the president’s authority to conduct war,” and “necessity or self-defense” could be used to justify interrogation methods that would seem to violate US law.

Subsequent attempts to back away from Bybee’s memo were unconvincing, as long as extraordinary rendition kept torture very much in the arsenal of weapons to be used against terror suspects.

The Obama administration has repudiated torture, but has not stopped extraordinary rendition. Instead, it relies on “diplomatic assurances” that detainees will not be abused. Moreover, the White House continues to withhold information about the abuses that have occurred.

“The time has come for the United States and its partner governments to own up to their responsibility for secret detention and extraordinary rendition operations,” urges the OSF. “If they do not seize this opportunity, chances are that the truth will emerge by other means to embarrass them.”

Indeed that is already happening. The European Court of Human Rights is about to declassify reports about secret prisons in Poland, a prospect that makes the Polish government distinctly uncomfortable.

As the "war on terror" shifts focus, the US will have its work cut out for it to reclaim the moral high ground. As the German philosopher Nietzsche once said: “Battle not with monsters lest ye become one, and as you gaze into the abyss the abyss gazes also into you.”

http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/americas/united-states/130206/obama-drone-war-rendition-target-american-al-qaeda-brennan-hearing

Anthony Gajadhar More than 1 year ago
In NASSER-AL-AWLAKI case, it would see that the present government of the US. is above the country' own laws. Anthony Gajadhar
yumamichaels More than 1 year ago
If a police commander can give an order to kill an (American citizen) hostage-taker, why couldn't the Commander in Chief give an order to kill an American citizen who is publicly taking measures to terrorize (kill) Americans?