Connect to share and comment

Why Edward Snowden's flight to Hong Kong might be brilliant

The NSA whistleblower could exploit a loophole in the Chinese territory's asylum system to buy himself some valuable time.

Hong kong harbor skylineEnlarge
A junk sails on Victoria Harbour in front of the Hong Kong skyline on June 3, 2013. (PHILIPPE LOPEZ/AFP/Getty Images)

HONG KONG — There are many reasons why NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden's decision to come to Hong Kong could be foolish. 

Hong Kong has an extradition treaty with the United States; its government is weak; its foreign policy is dictated by Beijing — no friend of free speech or internet freedom.

But there is at least one reason it could be incredibly shrewd: Hong Kong's asylum system is currently stuck in a state of limbo that could allow Snowden to exploit a loophole and buy some valuable time. 

A former CIA employee working as a contractor with the US National Security Agency (NSA), Snowden leaked to the UK's Guardian newspaper stunning details of a top-secret US spying program.

Simon Young, director of the Centre for Comparative and Public Law at the University of Hong Kong, told GlobalPost that a decision delivered by Hong Kong's High Court in March of this year required the government to create a new procedure for reviewing asylum applications. 

Until the government does this, he said, asylum seekers are allowed to stay in Hong Kong indefinitely. 

More from GlobalPost: What if we covered the US like we cover the world? Read: "Inside the United States"

"We’re still waiting to hear from government how they are going to implement this decision," said Young. "Until that’s the case, you can’t return anyone until the law’s in place." 

In other words, should Snowden apply for asylum, then even if the US made a valid extradition request and Hong Kong was willing to comply he could not be deported until the government figured out a new way to review asylum cases — a potentially lengthy process. 

Nicholas Bequelin of Human Rights Watch says that any Snowden extradition must be "a long way off" because of this gap in the law. 

"If it comes to the point where the US does issue a warrant on Snowden, and then passes it over to the Hong Kong authorities, and he decides to fight it, at this point it would be a court case," he told GlobalPost. "And it can be a long court case, going up to the court of final appeals."

The United Nations High Commission for Refugees in Hong Kong said that it could not disclose whether or not Snowden had begun the process of seeking asylum. In his conversations with the media, Snowden has indicated that he ultimately hopes to find sanctuary in Iceland.

More from GlobalPost: Surveillance state USA: Brave not-so-new world

Apart from this temporary asylum loophole, however, Snowden's case faces many hurdles.

David Zweig, professor of Chinese politics at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, points out that if Snowden was hoping to throw himself on the sympathy of mainland China — which has sovereignty over Hong Kong — then his timing is poor. 

"For a foreign policy perspective, it's a bad choice," says Zweig, noting that Xi Jinping and Barack Obama just finished a two-day summit in California. 

"If relations were [bad], China might have said, 'Let’s make the Americans a little anxious.' But we just had this effort to build goodwill, and this would undermine this goodwill so fast. That’s why I think they’ll let him go." 

On discussion boards, some Hong Kong residents debated whether Snowden might have cut a deal with mainland authorities. The website Bad Canto translated one writer who speculated in Cantonese that Snowden had "become a spy for China when he was in the US, or he may have fallen to a honey trap. What was reported was probably less than 20 percent of what had happened."

And there's another way Snowden could evade extradition.

More from GlobalPost: 7 graphs that prove the United States is overrated

Patricia Ho, a lawyer at Daly & Associates, which specializes in refugee cases and international public law, told GlobalPost that in December Hong Kong courts ruled the government could not send people home if they would face cruel and unusual punishment.

"The reason I think this is relevant," said Ho, "is because if you look at the case of Bradley Manning, during his detention period, he was found to have suffered cruel and degrading treatment. It was found by the UN special rapporteur on torture," she said.

"I would imagine given the similarity in the cases that Snowden could easily say, 'Well, I fear that the same would happen to me,' and use that as a basis to claim protection in Hong Kong. If he does that I would say his chances of protection would be fair."

More from GlobalPost: Snowden, Manning and the rise of the American antihero

http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/asia-pacific/china/130610/why-edward-snowden-hong-kong-extradition-asylum

Anastas6o More than 1 year ago
my neighbor's step-mother makes $76 an hour on the computer. She has been out of work for 10 months but last month her payment was $15443 just working on the computer for a few hours. Read more on this site Go to site and open Home for details >>>> www jℴℬs34 ℂℴℳ
Nathan More than 1 year ago
. on sunday I bought a new Ford Mustang from having made $8622 this last month and-even more than, $10 thousand this past-month. it's actualy the most financially rewarding I have ever done. I began this 9-months ago and almost immediately started to earn minimum $73, p/h. I went to this web-site,duℬ40 ℭℴℳ
Hurricanes More than 1 year ago
Our government CIA, FSA, FBI, etc. should NEVER have gotten involved in this massive invasion of privacy. We all KNOW that they had nefarious motives that had NOTHING TO DO with finding a "terrorist". By expanding this program so exponentially, they could never trust the thousands of people who worked for them to be quiet. I imagine there are more WHISTLEBLOWERS to come out now. Let's wait & see.
KerryHitch6 More than 1 year ago
as Wayne answered I'm amazed that a stay at home mom able to profit $4274 in four weeks on the computer. have you read this website ............ Rich6. ℂom
pjkim00 More than 1 year ago
I was scratching my head about why he would pick a country that has an extradition treaty with the US. But the more I think about it, it was a a shrewd pick. The US criticizes China about its lack of civil and human rights. If a Chinese citizen were to expose embarrassing information regarding a secret Chinese surveillance program, the US would probably grant political asylum. Although the Chinese citizen's actions were clearly illegal, they are consistent with the US ideals of transparency and freedom. For the United states of America to make Hong Kong (and China by proxy because they have veto power) extradite Edward Snowden would be the most hypocritical thing imaginable. It is truly sad to see this scenario being played out in reverse. Turning around the apologist's rational that if you have done nothing wrong, you have nothing to fear-- if the government did nothing wrong, it has nothing to hide. The fact that this surveillance program was kept secret is tacit admission that they knew it was wrong or a the very least would not be accepted by many Americans.
Cavan Mejias More than 1 year ago
the us embassy in china didn't take in this guy: www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-17673505.
John de Oliveira More than 1 year ago
Greatread.