Connect to share and comment
It's an official trend: Robot restaurants have appeared in Japan, South Korea, China and now Thailand.
BANGKOK — Intrepid and numb to fatigue, robots have come for human jobs before. Just ask fighter pilots, autoworkers and Wal-Mart check-out clerks.
Now, in Asia at least, robots are encroaching on yet another occupation: waiting tables.
The trend is official. In the past three years alone, robot food servers have appeared in Japan, South Korea, Hong Kong and mainland China. The latest restaurant to employ robo-waiters, a Japanese-themed sushi-and-bareque eatery in Bangkok, has even fitted its bots with samurai plating and prop swords.
Should the developed world brace for a coming wave of robo-waiters? Maybe, according to robotics experts contacted by GlobalPost. But waiter bots, they say, will remain less competent than humans for some time to come.
“It’s really just a conveyor belt, bringing food from the kitchen, with lots of bells and whistles.”~Devendra Garg, head of Duke University’s Robotics Laboratory
Human waiters will actually prove quite resilient, according to Illah Nourbakhsh, a professor at Carnegie Mellon University’s Robotics Institute. The advantage is personality, among the hardest assets to replicate in robotics.
“The robot can’t do banter or upsell or say, ‘You’ve got to get this dessert because I had it last week and you’re gonna love it,’” Nourbakhsh said.
In fact, they can barely hold a conversation. So far, Asia’s various robot waiters amount to a new-wave Chuck E. Cheese-style spectacle. Some can interpret basic voice commands, as can $50 mobile phones. They can deliver trays of food and bus tables, but only along a fixed route.
And they cost much more than humans, especially in Asia, where a 10-hour shift of taking orders and running food trays typically pays less than $10. The two waiter bots at Bangkok’s Hajime Robot Restaurant, for example, cost a total of $930,000.
What Asia’s robo-waiters may herald, however, is the ATM-ing of restaurants.
Because robo-waiters aren’t yet conversational, diners at robot restaurants tap out their food orders on a table-mounted touch screen or a unit fixed to the robot’s belly.
This may ingratiate more people to human-free food ordering, just as humans were trained to bank via machine and scan Fruit Loops at the grocery store.
“At first, such technologies may put people off. But eventually most of us accept these possibilities as an option that you can choose if you want to,” said Henrik Scharfe, associate professor at Denmark's Aalborg University and director of center for Computer Mediated Epistemology.
Scharfe’s work focuses on humans’ emotional responses to robots. His personal robo-clone — complete with graying goatee scruff — is so unsettlingly accurate that it’s risen to YouTube celebrity status. But even Scharfe concedes that “if you like small talk or even flirting a little with the waiter,” today’s bots will prove unsatisfying.
Consider “Yumbo,” a robot that will debut this year at Thailand’s popular hot pot franchises, MK. An estimated 10 shops will get a Yumbo bot, which has the height and voice of a pre-pubescent boy. He travels on rubber treading and can carry a single food tray.
Yumbo can squeak out “Happy Birthday” and some niceties in Thai. And thanks to radio-frequency identification tags, he’ll never deliver food to the wrong table.
But Yumbo can’t field complicated questions. A similar bot is deployed in restaurants in Hong Kong and in China’s northern Shandong province, where waiter bots ply the aisles on three-wheeled carts.
However, Scharfe believes the dawn of more competent waiter bots is relatively near. Waiters and patrons already follow a well-worn script, he said, “with a pattern of communication that is very predictable.”
Scharfe noted that, through hand gestures he once negotiated a suit’s style, fabric and price with a human Shanghai tailor. He also recently ordered food at a Japanese shop through pointing. In such predictable scenarios, he said, robots could play the role of clerk if humans are willing to tolerate a “less than perfect interaction.”
“Both parties have a clear understanding of the situation and their role in it,” he said. “This is also why it is relatively easy to have a machine performing one role in the game.”
But Nourbakhsh, the Carnegie-Mellon roboticist, is less convinced. He predicts that in the not-too-distant future some enterprising restauranteur will attempt to deploy waiter bots boasting enough artificial intelligence for a full-on, back-and-forth chat.
“That idea will come and it will fail,” he said. “People will assume it has more intelligence than it does. But it won’t be able to answer a lot of your questions. And it’ll be very boring.”