Post apartheid South Africa prides itself striving for good relations between the black majority and white minority. Many have been riled by the Canadian court decision to grant asylum to a white man who claimed he was discriminated against. Here South African President Jacob Zuma laughs with opposition Democratic Alliance leader Helen Zille during a visit to construction at the Green Point stadium in Cape Town, June 11, 2009. (Mark Wessels/Reuters)

Canadian decision riles South Africans

Share on Facebook StumbleUpon Add to Reddit Print Version Email Article

Black and white South Africans outraged at Canadian decision to grant man refugee status because he is white.

By Erin Conway-Smith — Special to GlobalPost

Published: September 9, 2009 05:35 ET

JOHANNESBURG, South Africa — Brandon Huntley was exultant when he first won a ruling that granted him refugee status in Canada.

“Look for me in tomorrow’s Ottawa Sun people, lookout I’m a celebrity!” he wrote on his Facebook site.

But he quickly deleted the comment and now faces a backlash that could force him back to South Africa. Under heavy pressure from the South African government, Canada has said it will ask its Federal Court to review the controversial decision that granted Huntley refugee status on the grounds that as a white man he was persecuted by black criminals in his home country.

If Huntley is sent back to South Africa he will find a hostile media and strong criticism from mainstream political leaders.

South Africa’s home affairs spokesman Ronnie Mamoepa said that Canada’s decision was based on “absolute rubbish,” while the African National Congress called it “racist.”

“Our anger is wasted on such a numbskull and his sympathetic party of simpletons,” said an editorial in the Sowetan. “When people display such shocking levels of ignorance as Huntley and the Canadian refugees board have, they deserve our pity, not our anger.”

Nor does South Africa’s main opposition party, with widespread white support, have any time for Huntley. “If he’s not prepared to contribute to change and opts to live abroad, good luck to him, we have no support for his cause,” Melany Kahn from the Democratic Alliance told Johannesburg’s The Times.

Huntley, 31, who grew up in Cape Town and first worked in Canada as a carnival attendant, told the refugee board that he was attacked seven times in South Africa, including three stabbings. He said he was called a “white dog” and a “settler” by black assailants during these attempted robberies and muggings, although he didn’t report any of the crimes to police.

Canadian refugee tribunal chairman William Davis ruled that Huntley, as a white person, “would stand out like a sore thumb due to his color in any part of the country.” This is what strikes so many South Africans as absurd as more than 5 million whites live in South Africa, making up more than 9 percent of the total population, according to Statistics South Africa.

Davis also said that Huntley had given “convincing proof” of the South African government’s “inability or unwillingness to protect him.”

But South Africans admit that, the issue of race aside, Huntley’s case underlines the country’s significant crime problem and negative international perceptions of South Africa less than a year before it hosts the FIFA World Cup.

Comments:

2 Comments.

Posted by ejb on January 3, 2010 03:07 ET

Whites are only 9% of the population of South Africa and not considered a miniority?
Going from the Time Almanac 2009 Hispanics make up 14.4% of the USA population,and Blacks make up 12.8%.
2005 is the year quoted for these numbers.
Both groups are considered miniorities in the USA.
9% being lower than both of those numbers,I see no reason to count everyone white in South Africa as a miniority.
But I see the 9% of whites in South Africa in this story as almost a reason being used for this man to never have any type of a problem.
How odd?
I would think if his judgement is overturned he should file a countersuit of "racial profiling" against the Canadian government.
Because now he is being discriminated against in 2 countries.

Posted by boredwell on January 15, 2010 10:41 ET

What provoked those unusual number of muggings and stabbings!? I was mugged twice in Boston - once at gunpoint the other staring down a knife and didn't seek asylum in Canada. In fact, when I called the police they told me I should have kicked the perps in the bollocks! So much for serve and protect. It was injudicious to have granted Huntley asylum status without garnering all the facts. Was the decision based on his word only? No matter. I know this will sound as if I'm profiling him vis-a-vis his occupation but he's succeeded in turning his case into a carnival.