Connect to share and comment
New legislation would curb journalists' ability to expose corruption.
JOHANNESBURG, South Africa — In the old South Africa, journalists were censored, arrested and sometimes forced into exile when they tried to cover the anti-apartheid movement, including the banned African National Congress party.
Journalism has flourished since the end of apartheid in 1994, especially the country’s combative newspaper industry that regularly exposes corruption and government waste.
But now media watchdogs are sounding an alarm about a possible return to repression.
The ANC, in power for 16 years, is working to change South Africa’s media landscape by putting forward legislation that would curb the work of journalists. Its proposed Media Appeals Tribunal would replace the current system of self-regulation with a body that could prosecute journalists for inaccuracies and would be responsible to the ANC-controlled parliament.
Another hit to media freedom comes in a separate piece of legislation — the Protection of Information Bill — that would classify information deemed to be “in the national interest,” and make the publication of classified information punishable by up to 25 years in jail.
The outcry to this proposed legislation, coming on top of the arrest of an investigative journalist earlier this month, has been swift, sharp and verging on panic. Many journalists draw comparisons to the choking of a once-free press in neighboring Zimbabwe.
A declaration, signed by more than 30 of South Africa’s leading newspaper editors, appeals to the government and ANC “to abide by the founding principles of our democracy, and to abandon these proposed measures.”
The New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists said that the Protection of Information Bill’s “broad language and far-reaching provisions … is reminiscent of apartheid-era regulations since it would virtually shield the government from the scrutiny of the independent press and criminalize activities essential to investigative journalism, a vital public service.”
The Foreign Correspondents Association, representing foreign journalists in South Africa, reacted equally strongly. “A free and open press is one of the pillars of democracy and unfortunately there is little evidence of this on the African continent, other than in South Africa,” the association said in a statement.
Journalists are not alone in condemning the legislation. South Africa’s business community, including the head of a major supermarket chain, has complained that curbs to media freedom could hamper foreign investment in the country and negatively impact the country's competitiveness.
“In general, media control is not a principle that is aligned with sophisticated economies,” said the South African Chamber of Commerce and Industry.
Even the U.S. ambassador has weighed in, an unusual move for a foreign diplomat.
“America’s founders recognized that the best way to fight corruption and promote democracy in their new nation was through a free press,” Ambassador Donald Gips said in an address to the South African Institute for International Affairs in Johannesburg.
“We believe that, at the most basic level, governments are accountable to citizens, and democracy requires those citizens to make choices. A free press provides the information that permits the public to make informed choices.”