Connect to share and comment
Proposed ban stirs debate over religion in traditionally Catholic, but technically secular, Spain.
In September 2009, the Center for Sociological Studies revealed almost 75 percent of Spaniards define themselves as Catholic, though only 15 percent go to Mass every Sunday, and 55 percent “almost never.” Twenty percent declare they are atheists or non-believers.
Appeasing the Catholic tradition in officially secular Spain is proving a difficult task, and practicing Catholics aren't taking the prospect of the ban lightly.
The digital version of Alba, a Catholic publication, described the possible removal of religious symbols from schools as part of Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero’s government’s “crusade against Catholicism.”
Luis Carbonel, president of the Catholic Confederation of Students’ Parents, concurs: “This government is attacking everything Catholic — first with gay marriage, then fast-track divorce, now [expanding legal] abortion and eliminating religious symbols in schools. The government is making a mistake. The cross is not only a religious symbol, it’s also a cultural one. If we remove these symbols, we lose our character, our traditions, and, therefore, what we are.”
“Non-believers cannot impose their non-believing,” Carbonel added.
Groups that support a society free of religious symbols in public space argue that it's religious Catholics who are trying to impose their beliefs, citing the teaching of religion in schools, which is an elective, non-credit class financed with taxpayer money. “We are willing to accept religion as an extracurricular activity, paid by parents, as it happens with guitar lessons, soccer or pottery,” said Parrado.
But Pedro Rascon, president of the National Confederation of Associations of Students' Parents, thinks religion has no place in school at all: “Religion belongs to the private scope, it should be at home, the synagogue, the mosque," he said.
Parrado, Lay School Cultural Association president, makes a distinction between the case of students wearing a medal of the Virgin Mary or a David star around their necks and a religious image hanging on the wall. “I can wear a cross and that’s a private matter, I’m not imposing this symbol on anybody, it only represents me, what I believe. A different case is a cross on the wall in a public school,” he said.
“The cross on the wall must be present if parents request it so,” argued Carbonel.
But at Macias Picavea School, parents’ differing views ended up in court, and the court overturned the school council’s decision.
“If the matter were marked by law, future conflicts would be avoided,” said Rascon.
Early this month, the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg ruled in favor of a woman in Italy who had requested religious symbols be removed from the school attended by her two children. Following that decision, the Lay School Cultural Association asked the regional government to withdraw the appeal. The regional government, however, refuses. Parrado said they will take the case to Strasbourg if necessary.
“Colegios concertados” are particular to Spain, where they are private schools that receive public funds. Eighty percent of them are Catholic, owned by the Church or religious orders, and it is unclear how they would be affected.
Parrado explained another school in Valladolid is also undergoing judicial proceedings. The name of the center is Isabel la Catolica — after the Catholic monarch under whom the Jews were expelled from Spain, the Reconquista from the Moors was finished and evangelization in the Americas began. She must be turning in her grave.