Connect to share and comment
The one-time Western wannabe gives its strongest signals yet that it's willing to go its own way.
ISTANBUL, Turkey — Concerned observers likely did not need more indication that Turkey is disengaging from a nearly century-long attachment to the Western orbit.
Two events this week underscored this reality: first, Turkey voted, not unexpectedly, against U.N. sanctions targeting Iran. The 15-nation Security Council passed the sanctions, its fourth round on a defiant Iran over its nuclear program, with 12 nations in favor.
Second, Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan played host Tuesday to Russian’s Vladimir Putin, Syria’s Bashar al-Assad, Afghanistan’s Hamid Karzai, Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Palestine’s Mahmoud Abbas in a luxury hotel on the shores of the Bosphorus. The occasion: Turkey's takeover of the chairmanship of the Conference on Interaction and Confidence-Building (CICA), a grouping of influential Middle Eastern and Asian countries.
Turkey’s government has been rewarded with demonstrations of popular support for the sharp tone it struck in addressing Israel. Anti-Israel graffiti still litters the walls of Istanbul’s central Taksim Square, remnants of a day-long protest last week when tens of thousands of demonstrators tried to take over Israel’s consulate amid condemnations of its recent deadly raid on a Gaza aid flotilla.
“Turkey felt rebuffed that its offer wasn’t taken up,” said Meir Javedanfar, an Iranian Israeli analyst, “and seized this as a useful opportunity to improve its position in the region vis-a-vis Iran."
For decades Turkey has belonged to Western clubs such as NATO, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and the U.N. According to analysts, high-profile recent foreign policy maneuvers and its decision to revive a near-dormant regional cooperation organization are troubling Western decision makers.
“Turkey’s recent foreign policy moves as encapsulated by the recent flotilla incident make NATO members particularly uneasy,” said Fotini Christia, an assistant professor of political science at MIT. “The Turks who have flaunted their secularism are now owning their Muslim identity in the foreign policy realm like never before.”
Turkey and Israel engaged in their biggest and most lethal diplomatic contretemps last week when the Israeli Navy boarded a flotilla of ships carrying humanitarian aid to Gaza, killing nine Turkish activists who resisted arrest. The week before that, Turkey was served up a diplomatic snub by Washington when it refused to endorse a proposal on nuclear fuel swaps by Iran, Turkey and Brazil. Turkey and Brazil's vote in the Security Council against Iran sanctions was interpreted as their retort.
“The sun no longer rises and falls on Western preferences,” said Graham Fuller, a former CIA analyst and author of The New Turkish Republic and a forthcoming book titled "A World Without Islam."
“The foreign policy vision of [Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet] Davutoglu is sweeping and likely to persist in one form or another after the [ruling] AK Party falls from power.
“It involves a 360-degree sense of its range of interests and historical involvement, a return to a more 'global vision' than the narrow Western wannabe country that it was for so many years.”
Israel, a CICA member, did not send a high-ranking delegation and blocked condemnation of its flotilla raid from the final declaration.
As the westernmost country in Asia, Turkey’s engagement with the West began with its foundation upon the ashes of an Ottoman Empire whose territories had once stretched deep into Europe. Mustafa Kemal, a Westernizing leader from the Greek port city of Salonika, discarded the Arabic alphabet for the Latin one, and banned Sufi brotherhoods, turbans and all other examples of what he considered superstitious folk religion.
During the Cold War, Turkey entered NATO and became a Western bulwark. It is now the ninth biggest contributor of troops supporting the NATO mission in Afghanistan. It still holds hopes of entering the Western club, regardless of the economic crisis in the European Union.
But Turkish politics continue to be characterized by Ataturk’s distrust of the West, despite his qualified embrace of it.