Will the Falkland Islands come between the UK and US?
Published: March 14, 2010 09:03 ET in Europe
LONDON, United Kingdom — The “special relationship” between Britain and the United States has come under scrutiny here recently because of differences of opinion between the allies about a windswept archipelago in the South Atlantic Ocean claimed by both Britain and Argentina.
Known to the United Kingdom as the Falkland Islands and to Argentina as Las Malvinas, the tiny British dependency shot onto front pages in Buenos Aires and London when a British oil rig arrived last month and anchored 60 miles north of the islands to begin exploration drilling in waters included in the islands’ economic zone.
The affair has ignited intense emotions in Argentina, 300 miles away. More than 600 Argentine soldiers and seamen died in the two-month war fought with Britain in 1982, when the U.K. sent a war fleet and marine brigade 8,000 miles down the length of the Atlantic to attack and expel the Argentine force that had seized the islands.
The pride of the Argentine navy, the cruiser General Belgrano, was torpedoed and sunk by the British submarine Conqueror, with 323 lives lost.
In Britain, too, the conflict has the power to rake up strong feelings. More than 250 Britons died in the fighting to retake the islands, and the Royal Navy lost a destroyer and a frigate to missile and bomb attacks by the Argentine air force.
Then-British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher’s refusal to allow the islands to be taken, and the patriotic fervor she stirred up in support of the campaign, restored her own teetering fortunes and returned her government to power on a tide of nationalism in elections the next year.
Like Thatcher in 1982, the Argentine president, Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner, is thought by some to be whipping up her countrymen’s patriotism as a distraction from domestic problems — in Argentina’s case, the economy and corruption scandals.
So where does the U.S. come in? British leaders paid a high political and military price to support the U.S. in the Iraq war, in defiance of many of their citizens. Despite their government's protestations, Britons view the Iraq campaign as a war fought largely in support of the "special relationship," and are keenly sensitive about how Washington repays that support. Apparently it is not to be repaid with support for the U.K. in the Falklands dispute.
Post new comment
Dispatches: United Kingdom
-
A prime minister's aide is intimately linked to the furor over high-profile phone tappings.
-
The UK prescription for avoiding the worst effects of the global recession? Stage an Olympics.
-
How the "runaway general" contributed to a stage play about conflict in Afghanistan.
-
Tighter spending could lead to UK universities losing international standing.
-
Bold American craft beers give traditional British drafts a run for their money.
GlobalBlogs: United Kingdom
-
Discuss.Mark Wadsworth | GlobalBlogger
-
Charlie Brooker, a man I rarely read, reckons it is the press itself is the Elephant in the room of the hackgate story: The phone-hacking affair is...Slugger OToole | GlobalBlogger
-
Gerry McGeough, last seen in April confronting Gerry Adams, was in court today in the latest stage of his trial on a charge of attempted murder ...Slugger OToole | GlobalBlogger
-
Why did nobody tell me about this? You can access this fine (new?) service in the template/design screen/thingy:Mark Wadsworth | GlobalBlogger
-
Iain Murray of the Competitive Enterprise Institute in Washington was our guest at a Power Lunch in Westminster yesterday. His theme followed the...The Adam Smith ... | GlobalBlogger


As if this was the 17th
As if this was the 17th century. One would naively assume that times have advanced and attitudes on national pride had advances with them. How disappointed would one be. I lack the words to describe how utterly... inappropriate I find this. The plot for a bad movie that is, at best. If this "war of words" will actually turn into actions and eventually war, the UK will thereby prove to be nothing but the dregs of the NATO.
The true colours of America
The true colours of America always outs. It is staggering to think that America - who has waged wars in Iraq and Afghanistan in recent years - contains so many people who would accuse us of colonialism for declaring our unyielding determination to protect a small island of 3,000 British citizens from a large, aggressive neighbour who would seek to remove their liberty and right to self-determination.
The Falkland Islands are British and ever will be so. The lack of American support, as utterly irrelevant and unnecessary as it is to the unquestionable fact of our sovereignty over the Falklands, is an insult to the hundreds of our soldiers who have died in support of our American "allies" in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Don't blame Americans. Blame
Don't blame Americans. Blame our idiot president. Bush would have stood with you all like Blair did with us. You Euro-types helped elect him; now we've all got to live with him.
Well said, William.
Well said, William.