Obama's outreach: The view from Dubai
Analysis: From sprawling labor camps to the wealthiest enclaves, Dubai's Muslims react to Obama's speech.
There are many who couldn’t help but share their cynicism about the fact that Obama went to Egypt and was hosted by President Hosni Mubarak, who is viewed by most of the Muslim world as a brutal autocrat who has violated human rights to suppress all political opposition. There are others who scoff at his meeting with the House of Saud, which embodies an American-backed monarchy that revels in profligate waste and excess while millions of Arabs suffer under tyranny, oppression and poverty.
“I like that Obama is here talking and listening. At least, I hope he is listening and not only talking," said Abdul Kader, 40, a Muslim from Kerala, India who works the counter at the Sonapour Grocery.
“America has many words about democracy, but we hope we will see the reality of those words. We are waiting for actions, not words,” added Kader, who was serving a long line of customers.
Many of them were picking up newspapers in Arabic and Urdu with headlines about Obama’s arrival in Cairo, where he gave his powerful, signature speech.
Sonapour is a sprawling city of 300,000 laborers who have come to Dubai to build the new, shiny skyscrapers that seem to fill every corner of the downtown here. The construction companies build the huge dormitories that make up Sonapour, where six men sleep in bunkbeds crammed into one 12-by-6 foot cell without air conditioning in the brutal heat.
The skyscrapers they build, including the Burj Dubai, the tallest building in the world, are monuments to the riches of the royal family and testaments to faith in the energy and creativity and cash that fuels Dubai and makes it one of the hottest cities in the world for real estate, finance and trade.
But the United Arab Emirates is a dream built on sand, and the laborers who build it live in a system akin to modern slavery. They come from desperately poor countries, all too often suffering from the corruption and despotism of U.S.-backed regimes in the Muslim world. When they arrive, most laborers see their passports taken and are forced into a kind of indentured servitude in which they must pay back the fees that brought them there before they can begin to send remittances home.
Their lives go largely unnoticed by a gilded class of bankers, hoteliers and oil industry executives who benefit from the riches of the kingdom and the economy it generates.
At an elegant dinner party Wednesday night in the neighborhood of Jumerieh, several of these successful businessmen and women talked about President Obama’s visit to the region as they were served by a butler in black tie.
This is the other side of Dubai, where they were focused on the economy and what Obama is doing here in the region and around the world to help it recover. They are mindful that Dubai’s construction boom has come to a near standstill in recent months, a fact made evident by the scores of cranes at building sites that stand frozen and silent.
Yet, still they also care about the overall message in the region and how Obama seeks to redefine America’s relationship with the Muslim world. The core of the issue for so many of these educated Arabs is Palestine and the appearance that America’s alliance with Israel has made it a less than fair broker for peace.
Lina Dajani Malas, a highly educated Palestinian woman married to an executive in finance here, tuned into Obama’s speech after a luncheon with friends. She said Obama’s speech provided important clarity about the need for Israel to stop building settlements and for there to be a two-state solution.
But she quickly added, “He is a beautiful speaker. He is eloquent. But the truth is we have heard this before. Can he really change America’s policies? Actions speak louder than words. And can Obama lead America to really take on those actions. We’ll see.”
If I read one more quote from a muslim 'man in the street' saying that actions not words are what they want to see from President Obama...
What actions exactly ? We hear much talk of 'US backed' regimes. What does this mean ? Countries who supply vital energy but won't treat their own people as citizens? Is the US to refuse to have anything to do with autocratic and repressive regimes? Well there goes the middle east, most of Africa, not to mention China...
What the bloody hell is it that America is supposed to be doing?
Her soldiers have been fighting two wars in an attempt to try and bring exactly the democracy that these people apparently crave to the region, and have eaten crow as a reward.
Whose fault is it that the region is full of poor desperate people? Is it the fault of America? The same people would scream bloody murder if Obama suggested they adopt American values and start making a prosperous modern world in their own countries.
They are very eager to burn American flags and spit on the symbols of the west, but why the hell do they think Americans are rich and successful in the first place?
Being poor and downtrodden does not preclude you from being a backward hypocritical fool.
The mendacity of it all is sickening.
Your comment sounds very angry and based on shallow reports from a limited resource such as Fox News. It seems that you have fallen into the media trap of mixing the anger at US policy with hating America and what it stands for. I am American and have lived in Greece, Lebanon, England, Egypt, India, and the UAE. I agree with your outrage at how people are treated by many regimes throughout the world, however I do not agree that people hate America because of its values. People dislike America because of it's policies. It is obvious that you don't really know the history of the Middle East region. I am no expert, however you need to look at the United States role in creating all the messes that currently plague many of the areas you are complaining about.
First, a little bit of history: 1)The United States has vetoed all UN attempts made to halt Israeli settlements and limit the legal borders of Israel per international law. 2) The United States created, armed and supported the Taliban for years to fight the Russians. 3) The United States supported Saddam for years before invading Iraq on the premise of WMDs and other false intelligence. This is just the recent stuff…
Whether the reasons for US interest in this region have to do with oil or strategic position, security or simply global trade, the United States is involved and it is high time that it played the role that only a great power can play. A DIPLOMATIC ROLE. The United States is a wonderful country because of its resilience and ability to change course. It would serve the United States well to correct the many issues in the Middle East for the United States, Middle East, Israel and the world.
Past administrations have failed and due to these failures there is distrust and a cynical environment especially in the Middle East. Perhaps the workers and the Palestinian woman were referring to a stronger diplomatic action than the violent approach as was grossly displayed during the Bush years. As Obama said in his speech, "We (the United States)are shaped by every culture, drawn from every end of the Earth, and dedicated to a simple concept: E pluribus unum — “Out of many, one.” Why can't this statement apply to the world? The world is made of different people who all want the same things: security, food, shelter, health, education etc. I believe that this administration has good intentions which can lead to great results--maybe even world peace!?
Dear hope. I defer to your experience of these countries of course. But I still do not see what it is that you propose the US should actually DO. You say that the US armed the Taleban. This is utter bull. The US armed the Afghan freedom fighters my dear. The Taleban came later. Are you suggesting that the US should have stood by and done nothing as the USSR used all it's military might to crush the Afgan rebels trying to liberate their country? It was a far more brutal and bloody occupation than the American led effort we see now, and it's aim was to prop up another doomed satellite state of the USSR, not to bring democratic reform to the country. of course people like yourself probably see no difference between the two. And what of Saddam ? The Iranian theocratic tyranny was ( and remains )a deadly threat to the region. The US strategy of containment was the only one available. Again, what would your strategy have been ?
The US refusal to pressure Israel on the settlements is mysterious to me. But I defer in this case to the US policy makers who choose to support without condition the one functioning democracy in the region.
You say that these people do not hate american values, and that I am basing this view on Fox news. Well, I hate to disabuse you of your comfortable stereotype, But I am actually a Brit who watches and reads just about every news source you care to name including Al Jazeera I should add , EXCEPT Fox news which I don't receive.
the hatred of america is far reaching and is very much directed at the values of the west which are in direct contradiction to the bankrupt muslim ones that have stunted the region.
It's a long sad story, starting ( according to Osama bin Laden ) with the loss of the Muslim land of Andalucia ( recently known as Spain ) . If you do not believe that such mad points of view can really exist in the modern world, I suggest you go to New York and see if you can find the fucking world trade center.
"There are many who couldn’t help but share their cynicism about the fact that Obama went to Egypt and was hosted by President Hosni Mubarak, who is viewed by most of the Muslim world as a brutal autocrat..."....and what, exactly, do they call their own leaders? Mubarak is secular. Their leaders are religious...there is no difference! Do these "Muslims" understand that if their homelands would offer education, respect with civility to their "poor" masses, they probably still wouldn't be happy? For God's sake look at America, the first, only and last experiment on the planet earth where we are as free as possible with our government but still bitch and moan because our government offers words, not actions, including this Obama. It is not the governments or the leaders, it is the people who need to grow up and realize they are now living in the reality they choose. We and they can change it, but it takes courage and determination and a majority. I believe the world has changed so much that the aforementioned is impossible!!
Recent on Worldview:
Opinion: China has a President Hu, now Europe chooses President Who?
Michael Goldfarb - Worldview - November 20, 2009 21:12 ET
The process of elimination that led to Van Rompuy's appointment represents all that is institutionally wrong with the European Union.
Opinion: Silenced in the Sahara
Timothy Kustusch - Worldview - November 20, 2009 10:52 ET
"Saharawi Gandhi" was expelled from the Western Sahara and is now on hunger strike.
Opinion: How to finance the war in Afghanistan?
C.M. Sennot - Worldview - November 20, 2009 06:32 ET
A question that, for Obama, is likely to hit home all the way over there in China.
Opinion: How best to get things done in Afghanistan and elsewhere
Mort Rosenblum - Worldview - November 19, 2009 12:35 ET
Or, the art of speaking loudly behind a door firmly closed.
Opinion: In France, l’Etat is no longer moi
Mort Rosenblum - Worldview - November 17, 2009 06:41 ET
Dodging corruption charges and facing jail time, French leaders go out of their way to give Louis XIV a bad name.
International visitors buoy US tourism industry
Susan E. Reed - Worldview - November 15, 2009 09:30 ET
Despite dreary economic times, a favorable exchange rate beckons foreign tourists to the majestic Grand Circle and beyond.
Opinion: Everyone missed signs of change in eastern Europe
Tom Fenton - Worldview - November 14, 2009 16:43 ET
While reporters did not foresee the fall of the Berlin Wall, the on-the-ground reporting was important.
"Damned United" and the tragedy at Leeds
Mark Starr - Sports - November 13, 2009 21:56 ET
A genuine soccer movie tells the story of Brian Clough, the greatest soccer coach in England to never coach the national team.
Opinion: Nigeria proposes reform of oil industry
John Campbell - Worldview - November 12, 2009 15:39 ET
President Yar'Adua puts forward new legislation but it looks unlikely to effectively reform the industry.
Opinion: Stuck in neutral?
Michael Moran - Worldview - November 12, 2009 06:42 ET
Some Europeans who steered clear of the Cold War may be wavering 20 years later.
The European School: a microcosm of EU integration
William Echikson - Worldview - November 11, 2009 19:32 ET
Czech and Slovak students don't dwell on their countries' communist past.
Opinion: How history's first draft got it wrong
Michael Goldfarb - Worldview - November 11, 2009 12:34 ET
The fall of communism in eastern Europe was not, as Francis Fukuyama wrote, "the end of history."
Opinion: Gay rights go global
Peter Tatchell - Worldview - November 11, 2009 09:22 ET
Homophobia still rules much of the world, but gay people are winning gains in nearly every country.
How 'bout them apples?
C.M. Sennott - Worldview - November 11, 2009 08:24 ET
The U.S. can't compete with China's cheap labor costs and mega orchards in the global apple trade.
Opinion: How consumer choices can drive environmental change
Stephan Faris - Global Green - November 10, 2009 11:38 ET
When businesses realize that eco-friendly alternatives will help their bottom line, they take action.
Opinion: Incorporating lessons from Iraq
Mort Rosenblum - Worldview - November 10, 2009 06:55 ET
Rather than destroying a country in order to save it, turn to the hard slog of nation-building.
Opinion: The day after the Wall fell
Michael Moran - Worldview - November 9, 2009 17:55 ET
The fears of Germany and its neighbors in 1989 have largely been resolved by 2009.
Opinion: ALS, Lou Gehrig and Michael
Mark Starr - Worldview - November 8, 2009 10:16 ET
How one man's struggle with ALS called on Major League Baseball to take a stand.
Opinion: "Old fox" Mugabe outwits others
Douglas Rogers - Worldview - November 8, 2009 09:56 ET
Power-sharing government achieves some improvements but Mugabe still rules with iron fist.
Opinion: Why sanctions aren't the answer for Iran
Joel Brinkley - Worldview - November 6, 2009 15:45 ET
America needs to understand that punitive measures aren't going to keep Iran in check. Not when Russia and China have a lot to lose.
Watch GlobalPost videos:
Reporter's Notebook
It's straight out of Orwell. The Cuban government of Raul Castro has kept up the repression of the Cuban people through a Criminal Code known as...Read more >
Making peace is hard work. And there are few in the world who pursue it with the relentlessness and entrepreneurial spirit of Padraig...Read more >
The call came too early for President Obama on the Nobel Peace Prize. In fact, it was precisely 6 a.m. when President Obama was awoken by his press...Read more >
Featured: Special Projects
After the Fall:
20 years since the Berlin Wall came down
Life, Death and the Taliban:
Videos and stories
Study Abroad:
Students report from the road
Living in the Shadows:
An intimate look at China's migrant workers
A World of Trouble:
The global economy in 20 hotspots
Global Blogs:




Comments:
4 Comments.
Login or Register to post comments