Connect to share and comment

Irreconcilable forces in China

The roots of this week's violence go back. Way back.

Uighur Muslims pray at a mosque destroyed by an earthquake in Qiongkuer Qiake township, in Bachu county in China's remote Xinjiang region, on February 26, 2003. The earthquake killed more than 266 people. (Claro Cortes IV/Reuters)

The riots between the majority Han people and the Uighur minority in China’s far northwest are only the latest upsets in a region that has seen civilizations clashing as long as there have been civilizations. Xinjiang Province in Chinese means “new frontier,” a name that was given to it in the late 19th century when China was consolidating its far west at about the same time Americans were subduing the Sioux and the Comanche on the Great Plains.

But the Uighur people who inhabit Xinjiang call it “Eastern Land of the Turks,” and therein lies the rub.

Most Americans had never heard of Uighurs, a Turkic-speaking Muslim minority in China, until a handful of them turned up in Guantanamo. It soon became obvious that the few youths rounded up in Afghanistan following the U.S. invasion were interested in independence
from China, not terrorism against the United States, and some have now been resettled in Bermuda.

The dominant Han people of China probably began rubbing up against the indigenous inhabitants of Xinjiang around 60 B.C. when the Chinese established a protectorate, only to lose it to the locals. The Tang dynasty expanded Han Chinese control westward again, and
established a settlement near where the provincial capital of Urumchi is today — the scene of recent race riots between Han and Uighur — only to lose control again.

The golden age of the Uighurs came in the 8th and 9th centuries when they controlled territory from the Caspian Sea to Manchuria, only to lose it as successive waves of conquerors swept through. Xinjiang was alternately an important center of trade, lying astride the silk routes from Europe and India, with contacts with the Roman Empire and later Marco Polo, and a backwater when wars and unrest shut down commerce and when sailing ships took trade away from camel caravans. Buddhism swept in from India along these same trade routes, and later Islam.

The Chinese emperor Yongzheng began taking control of the region in the early 18th century when the British empire was still sorting it out with the French in North America. But, in the 19th century, Xinjiang became the scene of a three-cornered Great Game as British, Russians and Chinese all intrigued for influence in Central Asia.

Like Tibetans, the Uighurs are supposed to have an autonomous region in the People’s Republic of China. But like the Tibetans, autonomy has existed more on paper than in reality, and both populations feel themselves under occupation while Han Chinese settlers pour in to make them minorities and second-class citizens in their own cities and towns.

As far as the West is concerned, the difference is that Xinjiang has never captured the imagination as has Tibet, nor does it have a towering leader like the Dalai Lama to keep the flame burning. The similarity is that the West’s relations with China are more important to it than the fate of Tibetans and Uighurs.

http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/worldview/090708/irreconcilable-forces-china