Connect to share and comment

Opinion: Not enough troops for counterinsurgency

Obama's Afghanistan speech did not convince counterinsurgency experts and did not give enough details.

Obama did not succeed in explaining why there should not be more effort to better educate and train the troops who are already there, and get them out of the FOBs and into the communities where they can make a difference. Nor was he convincing that the troops will have sufficient time to train the Afghan forces to be effective.

Steve Metz, an expert on counterinsurgency at the U.S. Army War College in Carlisle, Penn., said the force ratios in Afghanistan even after this surge of troops would be insufficient for counterinsurgency.

And he remained skeptical as to whether the forces that will be training the Afghan army to effectively take control of the country will in fact succeed.

“The big question is not the number of troops, it is whether, by 2011, the Afghan troops can become an effective force. They have a very long way to go,” Metz said.

There were a few surprises to the speech.

The accelerated timetable for beginning the deployment in the first part of next year caught some Pentagon planners off guard. They had expected a 12- to 18-month period for deploying forces to bolster the 68,000 U.S. troops already in the war zone.

"As commander-in-chief, I have determined that it is in our vital national interest to send an additional 30,000 U.S. troops to Afghanistan. After 18 months, our troops will begin to come home," Obama told the cadets in a 45-minute speech.

These U.S. troops, plus an expected extra contingent from NATO allies of perhaps a few thousand, Obama said, "will allow us to accelerate handing over responsibility to Afghan forces and allow us to begin the transfer of our forces out of Afghanistan in July of 2011."

Obama delivered his speech to the cadets, but he was addressing many audiences.

He tried to straddle a deep political divide in Washington with Republicans demanding more troops and with Democrats and war-weary Americans looking for a light at the end of the tunnel.

He had to reassure NATO allies and the leaders of Afghanistan and Pakistan that he was not abandoning the war effort, while pressuring them to make sure they hold up their end of the bargain.

Obama was somber and convincing when he said he did not take his decision lightly.

"If I did not think that the security of the United States and the safety of the American people were at stake in Afghanistan, I would gladly order every single one of our troops home tomorrow," he said.

Masood Aziz, a former Afghan diplomat and foreign policy analyst and the founder of the Afghanistan Policy Council, a Washington-based think tank, said of the speech, “It was short on details.”

“He put on the table a military strategy. But there is no such strategy on a civilian side, the civilian, economic and governance strategy that is equivalent to what (Gen. Stanley) McChrystal has put on the table… .  There is a consensus that this can not be won by a military approach, so where is the rest of the strategy?”

 

http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/worldview/091201/obama-troop-surge