Connect to share and comment

A blog about human rights in their many forms.

Ending violence against women: It's not just about being 'nice'

Q&A: At the end of the day what we say only matters in terms of its impact. If women in war zones say they don’t feel it, then whatever we’re doing isn’t the right thing.
VAW RIGHTS 7114Enlarge
A woman raises her ink-stained finger after voting in the second round of the presidential election on May 18, 2014 in Bissau. Guinea-Bissau voted for a new president on May 18 in a key test for a fragile state plagued by powerful cocaine cartels and upended in a military coup two years ago. (SEYLLOU/AFP/Getty Images)

Two weeks after UN Special Envoy Angelina Jolie and British Foreign Secretary William Hague’s four-day summit to end rape in war, media coverage has died down and the international community has been left with one question: do these wildly popular conferences actually effect change, do they fall flat, or worse, pose a threat to the work many are doing on the ground in every continent, nation and state?

More

Ending violence against women: When 'knowing' doesn't translate into 'doing'

Q&A: And thinking it does is a "very dangerous illusion to fall into."
VAW RIGHTS 63014Enlarge
US actress Angelina Jolie, Special Envoy for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, and her partner US actor Brad Pitt, look at displayed pictures of victims of violence during the third day of the Global Summit to End Sexual Violence in Conflict in London on June 12, 2014. Pitt added his A-list support to his partner Angelina Jolie's efforts to eradicate rape in war zones when he joined her in a flashbulb-popping appearance at a global conference in London. (LEFTERIS PITARAKIS/AFP/Getty Images)

Two weeks after UN Special Envoy Angelina Jolie and British Foreign Secretary William Hague’s four-day summit to end rape in war, the circus of media coverage has died down and the international community has been left with one question: do these wildly popular conferences actually effect change — do they fall flat, or worse, pose a threat to the work many are doing on the ground in every continent, nation and state? In this conversation with RIGHTS, Sanam Naraghi-Anderlini, senior fellow at MIT Center for International Relations and co-founder of the International Civil Society Action Network (ICAN), explores traditional conferences and alternative approaches to tackling violence against women. Transcribed below is part one of a two-part Q&A. Read part two here.

More

Bahrain's people are a casualty of Washington's political compromises

Commentary: Three years after protests erupted, democracy in Bahrain remains elusive and it's clear the US could have done more.
Bahrain Commentary 63014Enlarge
A Bahraini demonstrator, protecting his face from tear gas, looks on during clashes with riot police after anti-government protesters tried to retrieve the body of their comrade Abdul Aziz al-Abbar at Salmaniya hospital, on June 19, 2014 in the village of Daih, west of Manama. Al-Abbar, 27, died from his wounds on February 23, after he was shot during clashes between police and protesters. (MOHAMMED AL-SHAIKH/AFP/Getty Images)

MANAMA, Bahrain — In her new book, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says “Bahrain was an exceptionally complicated case” for Washington when mass protests broke out in my country in 2011. Her justification for not doing more to press for an end to the Bahrain government crackdown is that “America will always have imperfect partners… and we’ll always face imperatives that drive us to make imperfect compromises.”

The Bahraini people are struggling for democracy. They are the casualties of those political compromises. I was convicted for criticizing the government. I’ve just come out of two long, difficult years in prison. My mother died when I was there, and without information about the outside world I had no idea about what was going on in my country.

When I was released at the end of my sentence on May 24, I saw how much Bahrain had changed it is change for the worse. There is more violence; villages are big attacked by Bahrain security forces on a daily basis, people are being killed, but international governments are even more quiet now about what is happening than before I went to jail.

More

Picking up the pieces from a failed land grab project in Tanzania

As negotiations over responsible agricultural investment policy run through the summer, Tanzanian villagers fight for the return of 20,000 acres of land lost to a failed biofuel project.
Tanzania RIGHTS 62714Enlarge
Employees harvest fruits of Jatropha on June 20, 2008 in Taabo, center Ivory Coast. The Jatropha produces a seed oil which can be used as diesel oil substitution for power plant or transportation diesel engine. (KAMBOU SIA/AFP/Getty Images)

KISARAWE, Tanzania — I arrived in Tanzania, one of the frontlines in the battle over land grabs in Africa, just as another round of international negotiations on guidelines for “responsible agricultural investment” (RAI) wrapped up in Rome late last month. The policy document is intended to curb so-called “land grabs” in Africa and other developing countries.

Negotiations were not going well. The governments of developed countries were debating every point in the guidelines, which are slated for approval by the UN’s Committee on World Food Security (CFS) in October. They were resisting many of the most basic principles to guarantee the right to food and land for farmers and herders who have seen their land and livelihoods given away to foreign companies and governments.

Those distant policy debates seemed urgent as I sat down with villagers from the Kisarawe area of Tanzania, southwest of Dar es Salaam, where 11 villages have given up 20,000 acres of land to the British-owned Sun Biofuels for a large-scale biofuel plantation. The biofuel project has failed, and now the villagers are staring at 5,000 acres of useless jatropha trees surrounded by guards hired to keep villagers off what used to be their land.

When the villages agreed to give up the land, they’d been promised compensation for it and, more importantly, more than 1,000 jobs, a variety of community development projects – roads, wells, schools, health clinics – and agricultural investment in local farms.

But those security positions were the only jobs the farm was providing. The local village councils and some farmers have gotten a little compensation for the land, but have nothing else to show for it.

More

Amid election protests, Afghans wary of ethnic conflict

The protests, so far peaceful, are threatening the legitimacy of what could be Afghanistan’s first democratic transition of power.
Afghanistan RIGHTS 62714 Enlarge
Supporters of Afghan presidential candidate Abdullah Abdullah shout slogans during a demonstration in Kabul on June 27, 2014. Afghan presidential candidate Abdullah Abdullah led thousands of demonstrators at a noisy rally through Kabul on June 27, upping the stakes in his protest against alleged election fraud that has triggered a political crisis. (SHAH MARAI/AFP/Getty Images)

KABUL, Afghanistan — A dispute over recent elections is raising fears of a return to ethnic infighting in Afghanistan, where supporters of one disgruntled candidate on Friday staged the largest protests yet in a weeklong series of demonstrations.

Chanting, “our vote is our honor” as a call to rally, thousands of supporters of presidential hopeful Abdullah Abdullah marched from early morning to gather in a downtown avenue housing ministries and the president’s palace.

More

One year after DOMA repeal, marriage equality gaining momentum nationwide

Some US conservatives predicted the Defense of Marriage Act's repeal would "break this nation apart." Instead, recent polls and events show that marriage equality is increasingly winning across the country.
DOMA RIGHTS 62614Enlarge
Benjamin has his partner take a photograph of him against the backdrop of an LGBT flag with two interlocking male gender symbols at the center, inside New York City's Stonewall Inn, on June 26, 2013. The couple was celebrating the Supreme Court ruling, which that afternoon struck down the Defense of Marriage Act. When the decision was announced, hundreds spilled out of work and into the landmark bar, which is the site of the 1969 Stonewall Riots and birthplace of the 1970s Gay Liberation Front. (Rebecca Lee Sanchez/GlobalPost)

One year after the Supreme Court struck down section three of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) — to many a cheer from the LGBT community, and simultaneous warnings by conservative groups that the decision would “create a firestorm of opposition” — marriage equality has been on a winning streak, and the rainbow flag can be found flying in 19 states between the US coasts.

It’s now clear the ruling did not “explode and just break this nation apart,” as Tony Perkins, the president of the Christian conservative Family Research Council, famously predicted. The firestorm never came.

In fact, the decision seems to have influenced just the opposite kind of movement.

President Obama’s administration last Friday called on various new benefits for same-sex couples everywhere — including those living in states where gay marriage is still illegal — that range from work leave to care for sick spouses to Social Security and veterans benefits.

More

Hope and disillusionment in Iran as internet censorship persists and bloggers jailed

Commentary: As tech and gadget site bloggers are sentenced to ambiguous prison terms, Iranian netizens wonder if president Rouhani is unwilling to affect change, or simply unable.
2014016 voices logo 03Enlarge
(Emily Judem/GlobalPost)

TORONTO, Canada — Last week, a court in Iran’s Kerman province sentenced seven staff members from a popular technology and gadgets site, Narenji, to a very ambiguous 1 to 11 years in jail.

More

As Bangladesh files Rana Plaza charges, neighbor Philippines yet to learn labor lessons

As the Bangladesh Anti-Corruption Commission takes steps against those responsible, last month's electronics factory fire in Pasay, Philippines shows the issue of worker safety is not confined to Bangladesh.
Rana Plaza RIGHTS 62314Enlarge
A poster tied to a fence at the scene of the Bangladesh Rana Plaza building collapse and reading, "We want a safe work place, not a death trap' is seen on the first anniversary of the disaster on the outskirts of Dhaka on April 24, 2014. (MUNIR UZ ZAMAN/AFP/Getty Images)

Last week, the Bangladesh Anti-Corruption Commission filed a case accusing 17 people of violating regulations in the construction of the eight-story Rana Plaza complex outside of Dhaka that collapsed just over a year ago.

More than 1,100 employees were killed and about 2,000 injured when the building came down in April 2013. More than 200 are still missing today. Investigators later found locked fire escapes, extra floors and other breaches of building safety code throughout the structure.

The disaster triggered a global outcry for the enforcement of workers’ rights and health and safety standards in the workplace. In the weeks following the events at Rana Plaza, thousands of workers across Southeast Asia – where the low-cost manufacturing industry is expanding as a result of rising costs of labor in China – rallied for better wages and working conditions.

"The incident was a wake-up call," Farah Kabir, country director for the nonprofit ActionAid, told CNN on the one-year anniversary of the collapse. "Efforts are being taken on different levels in terms of safety and other related matters.”

But it seems Bangladesh’s regional neighbors have left that call unanswered. The deaths of eight women in a warehouse fire in the Philippine city of Pasay late last month, for instance, is the latest incident to call attention to the loose employment of work-related health and safety laws in parts of South and Southeast Asia.

More

A 'dark day' in Egypt as journalists are convicted of 'aiding terrorists'

Three journalists were convicted of supporting the Muslim Brotherhood and fabricating reports in order to destabilize Egyptian national security, despite lack of evidence.
Egypt RIGHTS 62314Enlarge
Al-Jazeera news channel's Egyptian-Canadian Mohamed Fadel Fahmy listens to the verdict inside the defendants cage during his trial for allegedly supporting the Muslim Brotherhood on June 23, 2014 at the police institute near Cairo's Tora prison. The Egyptian court sentenced the three Al-Jazeera journalists to jail terms ranging from seven to 10 years after accusing them of aiding the blacklisted Brotherhood. Since the army ousted Islamist president Mohamed Morsi in July 2013, the authorities have been incensed by the Qatari network's coverage of their deadly crackdown on his supporters. (KHALED DESOUKI/AFP/Getty Images)

Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi said on Tuesday that he "will not interfere in judicial rulings," following an Egyptian court's verdict on Monday that found three Al-Jazeera journalists guilty of supporting the Muslim Brotherhood — deemed a terrorist group after the takedown of former President Mohamed Morsi. The court sentenced two of the journalists to seven years in prison and one to 10 years.

"We must respect judicial rulings and not criticize them even if others do not understand this," the president said in a televised speech.

Secretary of State John Kerry responded to Monday’s decision by asking the country’s foreign minister to register his “serious displeasure” with the “chilling and draconian verdict.” But his mild condemnation came barely a day after he met with Sisi in Cairo at which point the newly elected military leader gave him "a very strong sense of his commitment [to] a re-evaluation of human rights legislation [and] a re-evaluation of the judicial process." Kerry then reassured Sisi that the US would "get on track" with the its $1.3 billion aid package — part of a (on average) $2 billion aid package Egypt has received from the US every year since the country signed a peace treaty with Israel in 1979 — and promised to send Apache helicopters for use against militants in the restless Sinai peninsula that borders Israel.

"The Apaches will come, and they will come very, very soon," Kerry said.

Egypt's military junta has shown increasing disregard for basic human rights, first targeting the Muslim Brotherhood and sentencing hundreds to death for their support of democratically elected and later deposed President Morsi, then implementing a "protest law" that bans public assembly without police permission, and going after journalists and activists — effectively snuffing out dissenting voices "across the political spectrum."

Monday's verdict has been slammed internationallly, with the United Nations warning of "a risk that miscarriage of justice is becoming the norm in Egypt." The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) has said that "the trial was almost farcical," and "the verdict had nothing to do with the law. It's a transparently politicized result, in which the [Qatar-based] Al-Jazeera journalists have become pawns in conflict with Qatar over its support for the Muslim Brotherhood."

According to the court, Peter Greste, Mohamed Fahmy and Baher Mohammed are guilty of fabricating reports, in support of the Brotherhood, with the aim of destabilizing the country’s security.

While Australian journalist Greste and Canadian-Egyptian journalist Fahmy were handed seven year terms, Egyptian Baher Mohammed was given 10 years, for “possession of ammunition — a reference to a spent shell he picked up from protests as a souvenir,” the Associated Press reported.

At the culmination of a five-month hearing, Amnesty International called the trial a “sham” and the verdict “a dark day for media freedom in Egypt.”

More

Taking the reins: who leads the fight to end violence against women?

The UNHCR says if we want a better world, we need to give the power to the women.
VAW RIGHTS 62014Enlarge
Scores of women demonstrate on June 17, 2014 in front of the National Congress in Santo Domingo against a Penal Code Reform in the process of being approved concerning violence against women that they consider as inadequate. (ERIKA SANTELICES/AFP/Getty Images)

The key to a more peaceful world, with more effective solidarity and delivery of humanitarian aid is the engagement and empowerment of women. This is, according to UN High Commissioner for Refugees António Guterres, “vital to better resolve a multitude of problems facing the world, including multiple conflicts and gross human rights abuses.”

He was speaking to a group of nearly 500 delegates from more than 260 aid organizations in Geneva on Tuesday — the opening day of the three-day UN Refugee Agency’s annual consultation between UNHCR and international NGOs, this year titled “Women’s Leadership and Participation.”

The conference, which closed on Thursday, stressed the need for a global partnership between the UNHCR and NGOs as various growing humanitarian crises make environments more difficult to gain access to and navigate. The importance of including women and girls in working to curb everything from sexual and gender-based violence and child protection, to rescue at sea and detention of asylum seekers for illegal entry, he added, is critical — not simply for political reasons, but in order to reshape imbalances that have become societal norms.

"One of the problems of today's world, one of the reasons why we see this multiplication of conflicts, we see this dramatic violations of human rights everywhere is indeed that we still live, especially from the political perspective, in a clearly male-dominated world,” Guterres told the group. “And it's still a clearly male-dominated culture that prevails in the way government's act, in the way that many international organizations... act, and in which even in some societies, civil society is organized.”

More