At first glance the sacking of Kenyan cabinet minister William Ruto looks like the government may be cleaning up its act, as Ruto is accused by the International Criminal Court of leading political/ethnic violence.
Is Ruto's firing an indication that the Kenyan government is trying to root out those responsible for the violence?
A closer look indicates that the government may be throwing Ruto out, not for the sake of justice and human rights, but instead because of internal political feuding.
Ruto was sacked this week from his post as the Minister of Higher Education. He is accused by the International Criminal Court of leading the 2007/08 post-election violence. He is one of six top officials accused by the ICC of involvement in the clashes in which an estimated 1,300 people were killed.
Ruto had already been suspended from his cabinet post after being accused of corruption, although he was acquitted in April.
More significantly, Ruto has fallen out with Prime Minister Raila Odinga, with whom he had been allied in the 2007 poll. Ruto is deputy leader of Odinga's Orange Democratic Movement but he has declared his intention to stand in the 2012 presidential elections. Ruto has well organized supporters who show their support for him in street demonstrations.
More from GlobalPost: ICC deals Kenya a double blow
Odinga is also expected to contest the poll so the two would be running against each other. So maybe Ruto was sacked so that he won't be in office at election time next year.
Odinga says he was cheated of victory by President Mwai Kibaki and his supporters in 2007. The election results sparked the nationwide clashes. The violence ended after Kibaki and Odinga agreed to share power.
Some of the worst clashes were seen in the Rift Valley, where Ruto has his constituency. He denies any involvement in the violence.
The coalition Kibaki/Odinga government is widely criticized, both at home and internationally, for being ineffective and corrupt. Few hope that the sacking of Ruto will change that.
And Kenya may soon have more wealth for politicians to fight over.