Connect to share and comment

The Fed is more profitable than Apple and Exxon. Combined.

How economic crisis can sometimes be good for the bottom line.
Ben bernanke capitol hill 2011 10 04Enlarge
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke testifies before the Joint Economic Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, October 4, 2011. Bernanke on Tuesday said the United States may face yet more slow jobs growth, as he warned short-term budget cuts and financial turmoil could further threaten the economy. (JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images/Getty Images)

The key to good business writing is the frame.

In other words, how do you take arcane figures and put them into an easy-to-understand context that's smart, useful and memorable?

Our friends at Quartz nailed that task today, with a post titled "The US Fed had a greater profit than Apple and Exxon combined last year."

Catchy headline: check. Interesting topic: check.

The skinny?

The Federal Reserve turned a profit last year of $89 billion dollars, its best year in history.

As Quartz points out, the combined profits of Apple and Exxon — America's two most profitable companies — top a little more than $82 billion.

So how did the Fed do it?

Economic crisis, of course.

More

Tons of stuff happened this morning — here's why it's causing the dollar to surge

The US economy is showing a pulse (add those numbers into the latest positive data on construction, cars, and houses) and it's not clear that the Fed has any urgency to act. While the rest of the world is easing, the Fed is seeing a US economy that seems to be hanging on.

US consumer spending up sharply in March

American consumer spending was up in March, according to Commerce Department figures released Monday, in a sign that points to speedier recovery in 2012.

Chart of the day: Obama and jobs

If the 2012 election pivots on the economy, then things are looking up for President Obama.

Conventional wisdom, of course, is often wrong.

But, that said, the current CW goes something like this: the 2012 election is going to be about the US economy. And specifically, about jobs.

If that's indeed the case, then things are looking up for President Obama.

Here's the one chart that makes the case:

More

Ahead of tomorrow's jobs report, a look at broader unemployment

A state-by-state look at unemployment, and under-employment.
American companies us jobs 2011 4 19Enlarge
People looking for jobs wait in line to speak with potential employers at the Brooklyn Job Fair on April 13, 2011 in the Brooklyn borough of New York City. Thousands attended the event which featured nearly 80 employers in a variety of professions. (Spencer Platt/AFP/Getty Images)

Friday is the big day of the week for watchers of the US economy.

The Labor department will release its latest check-up of US unemployment, the most important measure of the world's largest economy. 

Why is this one report so important every month?

People don't spend if they don't have jobs. And the US economy is driven largely by consumer spending. So any economic recovery begins in your wallet, and hence, in the labor market.

It's also important right now in the context of the 2012 presidential election, as President Barack Obama will argue that his administration has done an effective job bringing the US economy back. The GOP candidate, which increasingly appears will be Mitt Romney, will no doubt attack Obama on jobs.

So Friday's report will provide further ammunition to both sides, and give the rest of us another data point to chew over. 

Ahead of that key report, our friends at the Wall Street Journal's Real Time Economics blog have posted this handy interactive map, which offers a state-by-state breakdown of the broader unemployment measure called the U-6 rate.

The U-6 rate includes those Americans who would like a job, but who are so discouraged by the weak labor market conditions that they have dropped out (and are, accordingly, not be counted).

Click here for the interactive map, and see below for the screen grab (the Journal won't let me embed it here, unfortunately).

The darker the blue, the deeper the problems:

More

US Economy: Why Obama's economic recovery is impressive

We can easily identify some huge differences between the conditions that Obama inherited and what Reagan inherited.

Fed keeps interest rates near zero until 2014

The Federal Reserve does its part to help the US economy. Again.
Federal reserve 2011 12 20Enlarge
The US Federal Reserve Building in Washington, DC, on Oct. 28, 2008. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

The Federal Reserve is doing its best to do nothing.

That's the quiescent word out of Washington, D.C. today, as Ben Bernanke and team said they would leave US interest rates at "exceptionally low levels at least through late 2014.”

While noting some improvement in the overall labor market, the Fed gang pointed to a still-high unemployment rate, as well as the weak housing market and slowing business investment.

So it'll try to keep things going in the world's largest economy, by keeping rates low.

Here's the money quote, pulled from the latest Federal Open Market Committee notes:

To support a stronger economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time, is at levels consistent with the dual mandate, the Committee expects to maintain a highly accommodative stance for monetary policy. In particular, the Committee decided today to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and currently anticipates that economic conditions--including low rates of resource utilization and a subdued outlook for inflation over the medium run--are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate at least through late 2014.

But, as usual, I prefer my economic arguments in easy-to-digest rap form.

More

Obama SOTU speech connects on the economy

Swing voters liked the economic fairness message, anyway.
Obama sotu 2012 01 24Enlarge
US President Barack Obama addresses the nation on Jan. 24, 2012. (Screengrab)

President Barack Obama's State of the Union speech last night was clearly designed to kick off his 2012 reelection campaign by framing his eventual Republican contender — whoever that might be — as a heartless economic Darwinian. (Check out this smart New York Times analysis by Mark Landler that expounds on the point). 

But by making economic equality the centerpiece of his address, Obama was a hit last night with swing voters — those people critical to his success or failure in November.

That's the read, at least, from Democratic pollsters Democracy Corps.

Check out this chart, which shows what swing voters thought of last night's message.

Source: Democracy Corps

Those are some pretty good results, no matter how you cut it. The 24-point swing on the middle class point is particularly arresting. 

Of course, economic fairness is a theme that loyal Macro readers will find familiar.

More

America leading the world in debt deleveraging

The US is leading its peer countries in cutting total debt. Here's why that matters.
Dollars 2011 10 03Enlarge
(Bay Ismoyo/AFP/Getty Images)

The United States is cutting its debt. Well, the private sector is, anyway.

That's one key takeaway from an interesting report released today by The McKinsey Global Institute on how economies around the world are handling their debt problems that resulted from the 2008 global credit bubble and subsequent financial crisis. 

The US now leads the world's 10 largest countries in cutting its total debt, the report states. South Korea and Australia are the only two other countries where the ratio of total debt (private and public sector) has fallen relative to GDP.

It's an important stat, as McKinsey points out, because lower private debt often clears the way for economic growth, which in turn allows for public debt levels to eventually come down, too.

Here are the report's money quotes on how things are shaking out in debt-ridden America:

Debt in the financial sector has fallen back to levels last seen in 2000, before the credit bubble, and the ratio of corporate debt relative to GDP has also fallen. US households have made more progress in debt reduction than other countries, and may have roughly two more years before returning to sustainable levels of debt.

Two risks remain that could derail the deleveraging trend, McKinsey warns:

More
Syndicate content